| |
In lugnet.castle, Jeff Stembel writes:
> In lugnet.castle, Jason Cicchini writes:
> > I realize this, however TLC is responsibe for the Lego sets of the movie,
> > therefore my complaints are directed correctly. I'm sure Sony Entertainment
> > didn't say "Could you make Green Goblin's head three times the size of his
> > body? Thanks." Besides, I've seen pics of what the Green goblin looks like
> > in the movie, and I'm glad to report that on screen his head is correctly
> > proportioned.
> > I'm sorry, but give me the HP goblin heads over that crap anyday.
>
> It isn't "three times the size of his body." I'd say it is little more than
> 20% larger than a regular minifig head. I can't comment on how it looks
> compared to either the movie or the comic, since I have seen neither, nor do I
> plan to. However, the head *obviously* was acceptable to Sony/Marvel/whoever,
> as it made it into production.
>
> Anyway, I can see some uses for the head, and thats all that matters to me.
Okay, a little follow-up: A friend showed me a pic, and the minifig head looks
like a pretty good representation of the character's head. Is it a bit wide?
Sure, but minifigs THEMSELVES are a bit wide.
Jeff
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 2002’s good for Castle!
|
| (...) It is a good representation, but wouldn't you rather have a minifig head, instead of this helmet thing? Don't get me wrong, though, I see some uses for it. I just think it looks a bit absurd, as well as the frankenstein's monster hat peice (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.year.2002)
|
Message is in Reply To:
33 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
