|
> Summing, I am completely satisfied that I in fact did give an apology, and
> admitted fault. That is not the same as saying I won't do it again(1). That
> is also completely independent of whether you agree or not. If you still
> aren't getting the distinction you may want to review the definition of apology.
Something needs to be done. All of our e-mails are displayed here based on
trust. If members here feel they have the right to abuse that trust, what
sort of place will this become?
This person has taken my details from this forum, and used them to commit a
fraudulent act and invade my privacy. He is now threatening to repeat that
action. This, in my view, is completely unacceptable. Anyone who has any
regard for civil liberties will recognise that.
Ban him.
Scott A
FUT lugent.admin.general
x-posted to .general, as this is an issue which concerns us all... or at
least is should.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: Apology.
|
| My My, someone got up on the wrong side of the bed this morning.... I normally stay out of debate, I don't need anymore crap in my life, though you brought this into the public forum where I do read, and of course, I had to go back and look at the (...) (23 years ago, 24-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Apology.
|
| (...) No. Because he SAID he didn't want it. (...) Actually, I apologised for neither of these reasons. I apologised because in hindsight it was a violation of his privacy to unsubscribe him, even if he *wanted* it done, which he said he did, just (...) (23 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
31 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|