Subject:
|
Re: Lego and Speilberg?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 9 May 2000 20:57:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1624 times
|
| |
|
|
> Is it only me that's totally unenthusiastic about such ventures by Lego?
> Am I the only one that thinks Lego getting into software is a poor move, at
> least on current track record?
There's no contest there. Making educaional software without making it multi-
platform is like building a bike without wheels. Perhaps they will decide to
create certain pieces of software specifically for adults rather than trying to
appeal to everyone.
> Is it just me that wishes Lego would just concentrate on making some decent
> sets for a change, such as a train that looks like a train or town sets that
> are not juniorised?
Or real space sets rather than Star Wars ____. I long for the return/update of
my beloved M-tron. Waiting until 2006 for another space set doesn't do much to
change that opinion.
I alos wouldn't mind seeing Technic sets that weren't rehashes of older sets.
How many different colored race cars do we really need to see anyway? I think
this is part of the reason that the space shuttle and super car appealed to so
many. They weren't the same as everything that came before.
> Or did I just get out of bed the wrong side today?
I wasn't there, so I'm not sure which side you normally get out on. If you hit
your head, chances are good that you exited on the wrong side. ;-)
>
> regards
> lawrence
-Dave
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Lego and Speilberg?
|
| (...) that (...) Lego. (...) Is it only me that's totally unenthusiastic about such ventures by Lego? Am I the only one that thinks Lego getting into software is a poor move, at least on current track record? Is it just me that wishes Lego would (...) (26 years ago, 9-May-00, to lugnet.general)
|
31 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
