Subject:
|
Re: Cats and pigeons...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 10 Dec 1999 14:49:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
795 times
|
| |
|
|
Lorbaat wrote:
> In lugnet.general, Suzanne D. Rich writes:
>
> > I want no leaks posted to LUGNET.
> >
> > If there is any chance your data may be a leak, obtain clearance from
> > appropriate parties at the LEGO Company. If it's fine with them, it's fine • with
> > me. LUGNET plays by their rules. period.
>
> So, just to be clear, LUGNET is no longer a place we should post:
>
> - Price lists gleaned from Toys R Us computers?
>
> - Pointers to websites that have images of sets before their release (ie,
> TheForce.net, TheOuterRim.com, etc)?
>
> Both of these things seem to be directly in violation of the new hard-lined
> terms you're setting forth, and yet both are things that have been fairly
> standard things during the period before new set releases in the past. I
> remember when the prototype X-Wing was being debated...
>
> Anyway, looks like it's back to reading r.t.l. to keep up with the most
> up-to-date news...
>
> eric
Oh, I'm sorry, with this topic, for a while I thought I was in
RTL.....(heh-heh).
Not me, I'm gonna stay in LUGNET. The discussions in RTL can get so heated, so
vulgar, so......."lower middle class" :-)
I find LUGNET more civil. Not the wrabble you can find in RTL.
Even with this heated discussion, we are still basically civil (you can agree
to disagree).
Gary Istok
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Cats and pigeons...
|
| (...) with (...) So, just to be clear, LUGNET is no longer a place we should post: - Price lists gleaned from Toys R Us computers? - Pointers to websites that have images of sets before their release (ie, TheForce.net, TheOuterRim.com, etc)? Both of (...) (24 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
