Subject:
|
Re: 2000 Town construction sets
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 13 Nov 1999 21:48:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
763 times
|
| |
|
|
Tony Kilaras wrote in message ...
>
> Simon Robinson wrote in message ...>
> > So a couple more people don't think too much of thenew town sets. But am • I
> > really the only person on lugnet who's basically completely unimpressed by
> > the entire new catalogue??????
>
> I am also unimpressed. But this is an annual ritual here on the newsgroups.
> The new catalog comes out, and almost everyone reflexively "oohs" and • "ahhs"
> no matter what garbage is being served up. The 2000 catalog is a
> continuation of the distrubing trends that Lego began 5 years ago.
*LOL* Frankly, sets like 7181 and 7191 are a "disturbing trend" that I
sincerely hope they continue.
Of course, recognition of a higher age bracket for Lego builders, high
generic piece content, good design, these all mean nothing to the terminally
unimpressed. One wonders what they actually _want_ from Lego... ;-)
Paul
[My page: http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Shuttle/5168/ Update soon]
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: 2000 Town construction sets
|
| Simon Robinson wrote in message ...> (...) I am also unimpressed. But this is an annual ritual here on the newsgroups. The new catalog comes out, and almost everyone reflexively "oohs" and "ahhs" no matter what garbage is being served up. The 2000 (...) (25 years ago, 13-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
