Subject:
|
Re: 2000 Town construction sets
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 13 Nov 1999 03:38:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
596 times
|
| |
|
|
Simon Robinson wrote in message ...>
> So a couple more people don't think too much of thenew town sets. But am I
> really the only person on lugnet who's basically completely unimpressed by
> the entire new catalogue??????
I am also unimpressed. But this is an annual ritual here on the newsgroups.
The new catalog comes out, and almost everyone reflexively "oohs" and "ahhs"
no matter what garbage is being served up. The 2000 catalog is a
continuation of the distrubing trends that Lego began 5 years ago.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 2000 Town construction sets
|
| Tony Kilaras wrote in message ... (...) I (...) "ahhs" (...) *LOL* Frankly, sets like 7181 and 7191 are a "disturbing trend" that I sincerely hope they continue. Of course, recognition of a higher age bracket for Lego builders, high generic piece (...) (25 years ago, 13-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 2000 Town construction sets
|
| (...) So a couple more people don't think too much of thenew town sets. But am I really the only person on lugnet who's basically completely unimpressed by the entire new catalogue?????? I just had a look back at my 1996 catalogue - the last decent (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
