| | Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation?
|
|
Matthew Verdier wrote in message ... (...) Think it through, Matthew. Do you want to shield your children from the world... of paedophilia? of addictive drugs? of bungie jumping? At what point do you personally think it's reasonable to limit a (...) (26 years ago, 30-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation?
|
|
Janet Zorn wrote in message ... (...) Personally, I think it is unhealthy to isolate your children from the world. Too much isolation leaves them unprepared to make the hard choices they are going to have to make throughout the course of their (...) (26 years ago, 30-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: Monorail Question
|
|
(...) Well that's certainly the generally accepted theory. But to me, of course, the fact that they are Monorail trascends the theme and should have been the superior factor in deciding the numbering scheme to be used for the sets and the track (...) (26 years ago, 30-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: sorted links?
|
|
(...) Damn! There used to be a good one by Dan Jezek that was nicely categorized, but it appears to be gone. :-( That leaves the mind-numbing completeness of Michael Dorneich's page at: (URL) the title of the page says, it's "Everything Lego". An (...) (26 years ago, 30-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation?
|
|
This isn't exactly where I wanted this conversation to go, I think there are other, more important issues to thrash out, but I certainly don't OWN it, it will go where it will. That said, the following contributes to the tangentiality problem: I'll (...) (26 years ago, 30-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: Monorail Question
|
|
(...) 69xx is space. The Airport Shuttle is Town, hence 63xx (could've been 66xx or 65xx, but 6399 is where it came up at the time it was released). Since 6921 (accessory track) was released with the first shuttle (a space shuttle set), it has the (...) (26 years ago, 30-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | sorted links?
|
|
I was wondering if there's a page out there that has links sorted by interest. I used to go to the Cool Lego Links page, but it disappeared a while ago. I love Everything Lego, but sometimes I want to look at castles or spaceships etc., in (...) (26 years ago, 30-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation?
|
|
Also sprach Janet Zorn: : And Beaker, I share your libertarian philosophy. Since when did the : libertarian philosophy become an excuse for "as nasty as they want to : be"? There is a difference between liberty and licentiousness. To me, the heart (...) (26 years ago, 30-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation?
|
|
Matthew Verdier wrote in message ... :Beaker wrote in message ... : :>I have a libertarian philosophy, and thus a lot of my sigs have drug :>humor, ... I also have a couple that use profanity, and I am :>equally unapologetic. I maintain that the (...) (26 years ago, 30-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | 99 Catalog scans complete
|
|
well, all done scanning them, where to put them? there is a total of 2.61 MB of them, all the new ones up to the Search and Rescue Complex (P 29), will scan the rest tommorw, I ran outta space on my C: drive, where the scanner software holds a temp (...) (26 years ago, 30-Dec-98, to lugnet.general, lugnet.robotics)
|
|
| | Re: 1999 S@H Catalog ...
|
|
Fear not, for I am scanning the new 99 sets for everyone -- Instructions for usage of Ickna: Ickna should be placed on a level surface, maximum acceptable incline is +/- 5° Ickna is not a toy, may be toxic to less that .00013% of the population of (...) (26 years ago, 30-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: Whither Pause?
|
|
(...) Pretty much anything goes as long as everything is coherent and relevant in an overview capacity and is divided nicely into digestable portions to read (that is, reasonably short paragraphs of correct English sentences). But I'd say don't (...) (26 years ago, 30-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: 4970 Rock Raiders
|
|
(...) Is that still a problem? I thought that you could never get enough power out of a 'AA' cell to do any real damage. Don't they use an extremely low power laser, maybe even modulated? ____ |oooo| Cheers, |oooo| Wouter van Wageningen ¯¯¯¯ (26 years ago, 30-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Protecting Keychains - A Problem...
|
|
I just got a minifig keychain for Christmas, and after using it for this time, it has become relatively scratched. His torso has a few knicks in it, and I discovered today that the paint on his smile is chipped in the middle. Is there something that (...) (26 years ago, 30-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: Whither Pause?
|
|
Before I get started, I have a couple things to ask: 1. Should I stick to the same format as in the previous ones? 2. For the new elements section, would new colors for special (gems, for instance) be good or bad? 3. Could someone e-mail me scans of (...) (26 years ago, 30-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation?
|
|
Beaker wrote in message ... (...) Boy do I agree with you. Every time a certain Lego enthusiast tries to insist that RTL is a family newsgroup I have to bite my tongue. I am a relative newcomer to RTL compared to Todd, Jeff Crites and some of the (...) (26 years ago, 29-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: S@H Specials ...
|
|
Also sprach Terry K: : If your sig phrases are generated randomly, then that one was : particulary apt. :-) They are. Sometimes I think the script is psychic:) / _ _ / _ _ The Democratic Party itself is evidence of a ()(-(//((-/ vast right-wing (...) (26 years ago, 29-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: S@H Specials ...
|
|
(...) Thanks Mike!! Mondays are going to be a little less of a bummer now that we can look forward to the S@H phone special posts. Barry (who is smiling broadly, with his wife in the background rolling eyes with arms defiantly crossed). (26 years ago, 29-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: Monorail Question
|
|
(...) why Airport shuttle isn't 6993 will always be a mystery to me. It's not used, nor is 6992. (26 years ago, 29-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: Lego background for web pages
|
|
(...) Close -- not .bmp files but .jpg files. Here's the URL: (URL) set to lugnet.publish] (26 years ago, 29-Dec-98, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
|