Subject:
|
Re: Zombies!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.gaming.brikwars
|
Date:
|
Thu, 4 Dec 2003 04:37:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
6035 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.gaming.brikwars, Joe Comeau wrote:
>
> "Wayne McCaul" <wmccaul@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:HpC58K.1C60@lugnet.com...
>
> > Hey Lindsay
> >
> > Well, Zero's aren't affected by headshots. We could probably enhance it to say
> > that single gunshots have no effect on Zeros either. But multiple hits in a turn
> > should at least stagger them (-MR"). I also was thinking that, for regular
> > zombies, if they get hit enough to reduce thier MR to a minus (e.g., below
> > zero), then maybe they fall down and need a 1/2 turn to get up again. Would make
> > them easier to pounce upon with an axe or chainsaw.
>
> Actually, if a unit has zero or negative movement, it actually loses a turn!
> After all, if you can't move, what can you do? Keep in mind that this is
> different than choosing to stay still.
>
> > Zeros should probably never fall down.
>
> Why not? They could follow the regular movement penalty of -1" to get up
> and go about their evil business.
>
> - Joe
You're right, I really worded this poorly; That's what I get for trying to sneak
it in at work.
I was thinking, more closely that if a zombie got hit with gunfire enough to
reduce it's movement to zero it would "fall down" and automatically have to
spend half of it's movement on the following turn just getting up. Zombie zeros
wouldn't suffer this penalty.
-Evil Wayne
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Zombies!
|
| "Wayne McCaul" <wmccaul@comcast.net> wrote in message news:HpC58K.1C60@lugnet.com... (...) say (...) a turn (...) Would make (...) Actually, if a unit has zero or negative movement, it actually loses a turn! After all, if you can't move, what can (...) (21 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.gaming.brikwars)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
