Subject:
|
Re: Zombies!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.gaming.brikwars
|
Date:
|
Thu, 4 Dec 2003 02:47:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
8711 times
|
| |
|
|
"Wayne McCaul" <wmccaul@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:HpC58K.1C60@lugnet.com...
> Hey Lindsay
>
> Well, Zero's aren't affected by headshots. We could probably enhance it to • say
> that single gunshots have no effect on Zeros either. But multiple hits in • a turn
> should at least stagger them (-MR"). I also was thinking that, for regular
> zombies, if they get hit enough to reduce thier MR to a minus (e.g., below
> zero), then maybe they fall down and need a 1/2 turn to get up again. • Would make
> them easier to pounce upon with an axe or chainsaw.
Actually, if a unit has zero or negative movement, it actually loses a turn!
After all, if you can't move, what can you do? Keep in mind that this is
different than choosing to stay still.
> Zeros should probably never fall down.
Why not? They could follow the regular movement penalty of -1" to get up
and go about their evil business.
- Joe
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Zombies!
|
| (...) You're right, I really worded this poorly; That's what I get for trying to sneak it in at work. I was thinking, more closely that if a zombie got hit with gunfire enough to reduce it's movement to zero it would "fall down" and automatically (...) (23 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.gaming.brikwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Zombies!
|
| (...) Hey Lindsay Well, Zero's aren't affected by headshots. We could probably enhance it to say that single gunshots have no effect on Zeros either. But multiple hits in a turn should at least stagger them (-MR"). I also was thinking that, for (...) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-03, to lugnet.gaming.brikwars)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
