Subject:
|
Re: Zombies!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.gaming.brikwars
|
Date:
|
Thu, 4 Dec 2003 04:59:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5377 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.gaming.brikwars, Joe Comeau wrote:
[snip]
> Alternativley,
> > we could move whole *groups* of people at a time instead of indivdual
> figs.
>
> While I like this approach, it still will ultimate slow down the game if
> there are too many townsfolk since they *will* eventually go to one team or
> the other.
Agreed. The most obvious answer is to restrict that actual amount of townsfolk.
I'm just not sure what the right balance might be. I mean, the scenario is sort
of dependent on there being this pool of potential units for each side to claim.
I would like see enough people in various place that it's not a slam-dunk that
Team Town gets this group and Team Zombie that group just because of the
starting condtions. Maybe a series of smaller groups, 5–8 groups of 3–5 figs,
spread out. If they couldn't move until they interact with a team (or more die
rolling to see how many whole groups can be moved), then that would at least get
the inital turns going quicker.
-Evil Wayne
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Zombies!
|
| "Wayne McCaul" <wmccaul@comcast.net> wrote in message news:HpC52o.1B1L@lugnet.com... (...) it's (...) that (...) player? (...) at all (...) I (...) on a (...) Alternativley, (...) figs. While I like this approach, it still will ultimate slow down (...) (21 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.gaming.brikwars)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
