 | | BrickFest PDX 2004 is coming soon and we need you!
|
|
Are you coming to BrickFest PDX 2004? Do you game? Do you do Pirates? I'm coordinating the gaming at BFPDX 2004. I will of course run a big pirate game, but I'd also like to have some other games happen. Some BrickWars would be great. I will also (...) (21 years ago, 28-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming, lugnet.pirates, lugnet.org.glug)
|
| |
| | Re: Three new ships registered (Registry up to date)
|
|
(...) It wasn't really my idea per se - it kinda came out of the storyline with Dan, and it seemed only sensible that the Commonwealth might commandeer some of these type of vessels to go help the folks in Arbor. I don't know that I'll be setting up (...) (21 years ago, 28-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Three new ships registered (Registry up to date)
|
|
In lugnet.gaming.starship, Richard Parsons is pleased to register three of his vessels for inter-sector travel... Very nice, Richard! It's not very often we see non-"action" ships. I'll be interested to see how you play them (ship logs, maybe?). My (...) (21 years ago, 27-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Three new ships registered (Registry up to date)
|
|
The White Star Line is pleased to register two of her vessels for inter-sector travel: (URL) Liner Brikannic> (URL) Liner Tender Puissance> and the Commonwealth of New Pacific has registered one of her warships: (URL) CNPS Audacious> I think this (...) (21 years ago, 26-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Ancients Theme - armies, buildings, and cilivizations
|
|
(...) Excellent! I also like to build fairly 'big.' I find trying to scale a floorplan to actual minifig dimensions dictates a pretty large building. So, if live anywhere near New Hampshire..well, my castle can whoop your castle in a bit o' (...) (21 years ago, 26-Oct-03, to lugnet.build, lugnet.general, lugnet.castle, lugnet.gaming.brikwars)
|
| |
| | Ancients Theme - armies, buildings, and cilivizations
|
|
I've been working on my Ancients Theme for past 3 years. I was a Castle fan but after witnessing the gigantic castles made by other Lego fans I decided to out do them. So to go one better, I decided to make MOCs far larger than a castle, so I moved (...) (21 years ago, 25-Oct-03, to lugnet.build, lugnet.general, lugnet.castle, lugnet.gaming.brikwars)
|
| |
| | Re: A Public Apology
|
|
Oh no! My thesis! My PhD! No wonder they laughed me out of the room! Oh, I'll get you for this Rayhawk! You will rue the day... -Evil, Malicious, Vengeful, Wayne (...) (21 years ago, 24-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.brikwars)
|
| |
| | Re: A Public Apology
|
|
(...) It's about time. I've often been discouraged by the flagrant inaccuracies and utter disregard for thorough and comprehensive research apparent throughout Brikwars. Just a few points that I've taken particular offense to: (1) Nowhere in the (...) (21 years ago, 24-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.brikwars)
|
| |
| | Re: A Public Apology
|
|
(...) Mike, I am appauled. I had not read the Ninja ruleset until this apology prompted me to. Upon reading, I found many other egregious errors including: "Many animals in Japan, including dragons, cranes, racoon-dogs, and foxes, had many magical (...) (21 years ago, 24-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.brikwars)
|
| |
| | Re: A Public Apology
|
|
"Mike Rayhawk" <mike@brikwars.com> wrote in message news:Hn8FKs.MvB@lugnet.com... (...) contains (...) trustworthy (...) source of (...) in the (...) face. What!? What do you mean that it's not a source of well-researched and accurate information!? (...) (21 years ago, 24-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.brikwars)
|
| |
| | Re: A Public Apology
|
|
While I appreciate your apology, I do not use brickwars as a source of well-research and accurate information. I use the official ninja website. I do not understand why said site would be sued, as any ninja that would be offended would simply flip (...) (21 years ago, 24-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.brikwars)
|
| |
| | A Public Apology
|
|
I got an email today to the BrikWars contact address from a very offended reader. Apparently one of the quotes in the Medieval Japan supplement contains misleading information; specifically, the one in chapter MJ.6: Ninjas: "Facts: 1. Ninjas are (...) (21 years ago, 23-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.brikwars) !
|
| |
| | Hey Cool!
|
|
Wow! My ship, the U.S.S. Katheryn, is the Random ship of the Month! Cool! :) Nathan PS - Katheryn's getting lonely - new Starship vessels coming soon! (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickQuest: The Haunted Keep (Teaser)
|
|
(...) Well, we started playing, but there were too many distractions--we didn't have enough MichLUG members to watch the rest of the display and interact with the crowd. We got about 1/3 of the way through my scenario and had to call it (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.gaming)
|
| |
| | Big Arbor Email Problems...
|
|
I have some very, very bad news... My hotmail account, left unattended for a few weeks, last checked a few days ago, was above the SPAM limit. Seemingly, after going over the limit, Hotmail decided to "clean" and deleted most of the old Starship (...) (21 years ago, 19-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New Pacific action emails not up to date
|
|
(...) Damn. The New Pacific email is marked read, not unread like it should be. Replying now, sorry. -Dan (21 years ago, 19-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New Pacific action emails not up to date
|
|
Actually, the only two outstanding action emails are for the Blue Nomad and the Errant Kangaroo - everyone else I owe an email is up to date I think. I note that it was August since I last heard from the Carpathian or the Arrakis, and the Glimmer of (...) (21 years ago, 19-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | New Pacific action emails not up to date
|
|
Sorry sportsfans, but the registry fun and games means that I won't finish action emails until Wednesday. Apologies all round... (URL) (21 years ago, 19-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Ship Registry
|
|
(...) Done. I also noted in the ship lists that the Valach was lost, and discounted your Treaty of Spraw system counts to remove the Valach. (URL) (21 years ago, 19-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Ship Registry
|
|
In lugnet.gaming.starship, Richard Parsons wrote: -snip- (...) Well if you insist Richard ; ) All you gotta do is these few things: 1. change the UFS Hammerhead to Hammerhead and UFS Valach to Valach 2. change the organizations on the Hammerhead and (...) (21 years ago, 19-Oct-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
