 | | Re: What's so Adult about it Anyway ? (was: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
|
|
(...) Libraries are certainly a pretty safe way to hold meetings open to minors. At a library, you have the advantage that they hold most of the responsibility for any unaccompanied minors. A pizza parlor would be somewhat riskier, but still, the (...) (23 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| |
| | Re: What's so Adult about it Anyway ? (was: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
|
|
(...) Any organization that allows both adults and minors to participate in the same capacity has to be _very_ careful about this sort of thing. It's not enough to simply know that nothing's going on. You need to make sure that noone has any reason (...) (23 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest LOGO submission
|
|
The deadline to submiting your logo idea for the BrickFest 2003 event is approaching. Christina Hitchcock BrickFest Coordinator (...) (23 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.events.brickfest, lugnet.announce, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| |
| | Re: What's so Adult about it Anyway ? (was: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
|
|
(...) I think it depends on what kinds of activities the club participates in. I understand that some clubs have meetings in the private homes of their members. I can totally see how you might want to exclude minors in such a situation (or at least, (...) (23 years ago, 7-May-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| |
| | Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community)
|
|
In lugnet.general, David Schwanke writes: <snip> (...) <snip> Paul, for example [1]... ;-) [1] Acts 23:6 (23 years ago, 1-May-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest Registration
|
|
On 11:27 2003-04-28 +0000, Christina Hitchcock wrote (...) Hello, Stephen the BrickFest DB guy again... The problems that surfaced this morning with the registration site seem to have been fixed. The problems were isolated to IE6 and seemed to (...) (23 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.events.brickfest, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | BrickFest Registration
|
|
BrickFest™ Registration form is now available via the website. (URL) will be a bit different this year. Everyone that registers will get a password. The password will give each person access to their own registration information so that they may (...) (23 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.events.brickfest, lugnet.announce, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.people) !
|
| |
| | Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
|
|
Whoa. Did this thread stray or what? (Just look at the dots.) Tryin' to keep it light, -H.Man :) (23 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| |
| | Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community)
|
|
I do want to apologize for one thing. When I wrote that post with all the smileyes I was acting under the assumption that you would be comfortable with some friendly poking and jesting about the subject. Obviosly I was mistaken and you take this (...) (23 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| |
| | Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
|
|
(...) I'm not as compartmentalized a dork here as some, but with every post I read in this thread I only restrain myself from saying "take it to ot.debate" for the same reason given to you by others and by Dave! (...) The whole thing does belong (...) (23 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| |
| | Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
|
|
(...) Heh. That used to mess me up, too. It means that you will tag your message to send Follow-Ups To another posting group. (...) In fairness to the readship, it's not yet a debate because you haven't yet moved to off-topic.debate. (...) It's a (...) (23 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| |
| | Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community)
|
|
I'm too newb to know what FUT is so if someone wants to enlighten me I'll make any adjustments that I can. We already briefly had the discussion about the locations of these discussions and it was generally sugested that lugnet.people and (...) (23 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| |
| | Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community)
|
|
(...) After (...) It is unfortunate. Though I dont feel it is desperate I do have a built in need to talk about God that God has placed within me and as such getting to know me inherrently involves putting up with some level of it. If you really (...) (23 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| |
| | Re: Thank You Tim (was Re: For some Lego is a religous experience.)
|
|
(...) in, (...) Well I dont preach dogma. I speak about a personal saving faith that is individual to each person. But thank you for removing general. I wasnt sure on it. In general (pun intended :) I leave the group decisions up to other people. I (...) (23 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| |
| | Thank You Tim (was Re: For some Lego is a religous experience.)
|
|
"Tim Courtney" <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:HDs1JE.zuF@lugnet.com... (...) would (...) its (...) Tim has got it right- fun.community and .people sound fine to me but no doubt about it- please don't post on .general* My own advise, if (...) (23 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| |
| | Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community)
|
|
I decided no to read further than the first 2 lines. Respect is mutual. I offered a real friendly hand-shake, you answered back with god-talk, exactly what you know offends me. That's real nice of you. It just shows your level of respect for others' (...) (23 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| |
| | Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community)
|
|
(...) Hi David - It's definitely not appropriate for lugnet.general, and might not be appropriate for fun.community, but .people should be OK. Hope this helps! -Tim (23 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| |
| | Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community)
|
|
(...) me (...) I think I'll just pray that you dont flame me for praying for you. :) Or maybe I should pray for the flame war? I have seen people come to Christ because of them. :) After that 8month several thousand post discusion/flamewar I was (...) (23 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| |
| | Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community)
|
|
(...) <and a bunch more witnessing> Please consider setting FUT somewhere else, it's starting to veer away from general interest, IMHO. I set FUT to ot.d but that may not be the right place to be, I dunno. (23 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community)
|
|
(...) SNIP (I agree here to but have to cut my quotes.... (...) Well said. I agree, God Bless You, Nathan (23 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
