|
Frank Filz <ffilz@mindspring.com> writes:
> I used to be on the side of encouraging clubs to not have age
> requirements, however, under more consideration, I'm more open to the
> idea. In my opinion, the biggest reason is the way our country handles
> child abuse allegations. Because of the legal climate, one is taking a
> very large risk being involved with a "club" that allows anyone under
> 18. [...]
I think it depends on what kinds of activities the club participates
in. I understand that some clubs have meetings in the private homes
of their members. I can totally see how you might want to exclude
minors in such a situation (or at least, minors without their parents
or other parentally-designated guardian present).
But my club (BauLUG / BayLTC) meets only in public spaces, such as a
meeting room at the library, or the back room of a pizza parlor, etc.
I think in that context, there is a far lower risk of such allegations
being made.
--Bill.
--
William R Ward bill@wards.net http://www.wards.net/~bill/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by
little statesmen and philosophers and divines." - Emerson
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
200 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|