Subject:
|
Re: Am I the only one ?...................
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.faq
|
Date:
|
Sat, 5 Aug 2000 21:22:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
6602 times
|
| |
|
|
> Just to put in my .02.... I've told a few of you in private discussion that
> I really don't care for the JRFOL or TFOL distinction from AFOL. I'm with
> Greg. Even though technically I am now an AFOL (by certain LUG standards),
> it still concerns me. I don't want to see people treated differently just
> because they don't meet a set legal age. And people who are 'underage'
> taking on that distinction adds in my opinion to the distinction, or
> segregation mind you. Those are my feelings on the matter, after watching a
> friend deal with a tough decision by her would-be local group. Interested
> to hear others' feelings on the matter....
I totally agree, Tim. AFOL, IMO, defines people who create with lego, not
just play with it. If that makes any sense at all. Just tossing my bit into
the pot.
-Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Am I the only one ?.........
|
| "Nick Crocco" <swatlego@aol.com> wrote in message news:Fysv9p.306@lugnet.com... (...) it (...) should (...) Just to put in my .02.... I've told a few of you in private discussion that I really don't care for the JRFOL or TFOL distinction from AFOL. (...) (26 years ago, 5-Aug-00, to lugnet.faq)
|
32 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
