 | | Re: Enough already
|
|
(...) I know it was you, and I certainly didn't try to imply it was Todd saying that, although Todd said some thing that got me riled yesterday. And yes, there is _little_ distinction between calling someone a moron and saying they strike you as a (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
|
(...) I thought it was totally obvious that he was referring to oxygen, but maybe you thought of something funnier? ;-) John Neal Founded 1960 (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | What I'd like to see...please
|
|
Hi, Brad & co. I'd like to see a cd-Rom full of building instructions from older sets. I think this could be really great, if done properly. It should: Have teh sets available by set number and also by category ("Pirates," "Space," etc.) It should (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Enough already
|
|
(...) Anagrams. If his full name it "Bradley Justice" we get "rejects audibly" From plain old "Brad Justice" I get "arid subject" BTW : From "the lego group" I get "ghoul protege" Scott A Anagrams from: (URL) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Enough already
|
|
---...--- (...) And you got what you paid for. Bricks. And instructions. Paying the price of ingratitude could mean seeing ALL copyrighted material come off the web. It could happen, and LEGO would be well within their rights under copyright law to (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Enough already
|
|
I said what I said, and I stand by it. The fellow (I have not gone back to look up who it was) who took the tack of "Oh, yeah!?! PROVE it!" came across to me as a moron. I do not say that he is one (although I admit that this is a very small (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Enough already
|
|
(...) Hmmmm...could be...I see a conspiracy developing...Brad Justus... Brad "Just Us" (as in, "just us playing around...") Brad Just "U.S." (no bulk parts outside of the U.S.) Brad "Justice" (we're finally going to be judged by TLC) Or, how about (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Enough already
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote: <snip> (...) It saddens me that this "backlash" is taking place at this time...as a community made up of many individuals with strong opinions there have always been voices opposed to Lego Company practices, but it's too bad that (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
|
Jeffrey Baldwin wrote: <snip> (...) Jeffrey, This is a most amusing .sig to me. What are you a "user" of since 1966? The possibilities for creative interpretation have kept me chuckling for a few minutes this morning :) -- Thomas Main est. 1969 (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Enough already
|
|
(...) Calling Tom Stangl (or any of us) a moron is over the line. I'd like to note that the MAJORITY of the name-calling within our own community has come from the side of the fence that seems to want to shut people up if they aren't going to just (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Enough already
|
|
I have to say, I agree with Todd (and Susan, I presume). It seems to me that there are an awful lot of folks who are doing an awful lot of bellyacheing, and this over VERY minor things. The wealth of online matereial which is, in fact, copyrighted (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Enough already
|
|
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:385ce0d5.267874...net.com... (...) <snip> (...) with (...) respect (...) <snip> (...) Larry (...) there's a (...) LEGO (...) sense (...) mouths (...) What are you trying to say? Don't you think (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
|
A fair policy. Thank you for clearing it up. I was concerned that Lego corp would shut down any scans. It is good to know that Lego not only talks end users support but also walks the walk. Thanks from a very grate full user. Jeffey Baldwin User (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Enough already
|
|
(...) I met Susan a few years ago. She was very nice and, to top it off, quite the hottie. (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Star Wars LEGO Bucket
|
|
Is the rumor of a Star Wars 'Bucket - set number 1886 - at all true? If yes, when? Eugwe Coral (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Enough already
|
|
(...) No, not generous. Practical, yes for them. Nice for us.... Possibly? (...) Just need some clarification.... How do you mean that has TLG been disrespectful to us? By the lack of response to our requests? If this is what you mean, I don't see (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Catalogs, Justus and Lego
|
|
(...) other (...) current (...) make (...) It appears that I have stirred up quite the hornets nest with this quote, so let me clarify some things. I do not think that such a practice is practical, but it is possible. Those who say that TLC would (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Enough already
|
|
(...) Of course, there's always the possibility that he's a very close relative of "Susan Williams".... :) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Cataolgs, Justus and Lego
|
|
(...) And I suppose that now that you AFOLs have Lego's attention, that you would like them to start ignorring you again because you openly brake the rules that they have set forth?? Like I'm sure many people have said, those were not preview scans, (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Cataolgs, Justus and Lego
|
|
Kevin Loch wrote in message ... (...) to (...) started (...) I (...) faith (...) been (...) point. (...) current (...) That's fine. My point was that it's a shame there has to be any restriction at all. Why doesn't Lego get serious about supporting (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
