 | | Re: Bulk Sets (was: Re: How about "Technic Tubs" ?)
|
|
(...) Bill and Allan I brought that point up with Brad Justus at Brickfest 2001 when I asked about single color 3033's. I, like alot of other people, assumed (never assume) it was a loss leader also. Brad said it "was not a loss leader", however the (...) (23 years ago, 13-Oct-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Bulk Sets (was: Re: How about "Technic Tubs" ?)
|
|
(...) Sorry... let me rephrase.... There is not $19.95 worth of raw materials, packaging and costs of distribution etc. in that tub. I don't waver from my point. I still don't believe that was a loss leader for LEGO. Regards, Allan (23 years ago, 13-Oct-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Bulk Sets (was: Re: How about "Technic Tubs" ?)
|
|
(...) Didn't you read the part in parentheses? --Bill. (23 years ago, 13-Oct-01, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bulk Sets (was: Re: How about "Technic Tubs" ?)
|
|
(...) I've heard that too, but I suspect they are just talking about production costs. ABS is cheap, and there's no retooling needed to make basic bricks. So from that end it is certainly profitable. But when you include the distribution costs, I'm (...) (23 years ago, 13-Oct-01, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bulk Sets (was: Re: How about "Technic Tubs" ?)
|
|
(...) I doubt anything LEGO makes, now or at any time in the past, could be classified a loss leader. There is not $19.99 worth of raw materials and packaging in that tub. (...) I think an argument could be made that it might also be a staple for (...) (23 years ago, 13-Oct-01, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bulk Sets (was: Re: How about "Technic Tubs" ?)
|
|
(...) Lego has stated that 3033 is NOT a loss leader. (meaning it's profitable). (23 years ago, 12-Oct-01, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | RE: How about "Technic Tubs" ???...???
|
|
(...) Ahhh, the magic Universal Set words have finally been spoken. I have my treasured 8062 in its own Plano 3720 tackle box for short trips.... I think the reason there has not been a Universal Set in a while is that it's a LOT of work to put (...) (23 years ago, 12-Oct-01, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: How about "Technic Tubs" ???...???
|
|
(...) I hope FEW is the operative word here, Why not have a few double bend studless as well, now they ARE virtually useless. I'll don my tin helmet now cause Jennifer use's double bent beams to mount her rear mud guards, and Jon Barnes built his (...) (23 years ago, 12-Oct-01, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Tubs [was: Re: How about "Technic Tubs" ???...???]
|
|
(...) Last I saw my local Wal-Mart still had a fair number of Mega Bloks tubs, and even more identical tubs manufactured by Ritvik but sold under the house brand name "Kid Connection". (And yes, they clearanced their 3033s months ago.) I thought (...) (23 years ago, 12-Oct-01, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: How about "Technic Tubs" ???...???
|
|
(...) Here, here!! A fairly equal selection of studded & studless would be great! Including a few of the bent studless ones. The panels have their uses, but not in a bulk tub, please!! ROSCO (23 years ago, 12-Oct-01, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
