 | | Re: LEGO cheat on LEWA graphic
|
|
(...) Geez, somebody else complaining about this? See the other thread: (URL) all the fuss here? I think the only action figures in the history of toys that were articulated to the point that you could move them to the same degree that they move in (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jul-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO cheat on LEWA graphic
|
|
FWIW, I too am disappointed. Pretty much all of the Bionicle figures appear to have more articulation on the packaging than they do in reality. It is a good product line to be sure, but it would be truly GREAT if all of the implied joints actually (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jul-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO cheat on LEWA graphic
|
|
(...) Caveat emptor, man. But a more prominent actual photo on the package _would_ be most welcome. However, I think you're overstating the case rather a lot. The earlier thread about Onua's color had more merit as a complaint (but eesh! that (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jul-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | LEGO cheat on LEWA graphic
|
|
My 11-year-old son noticed something in the A4 sheet which accompanied the Bionicle Lewa (the Green one). The sheet has the designation 4130831. The side of the sheet I am refering to is the one with the large full-page image. The right knee is bent (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jul-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: 3412 / 3413 / 3414
|
|
sorry wrong group *looks sheepish and slinks away* "James Stacey" <James@minifig.co.uk> wrote in message news:GGM9y6.8AB@lugnet.com... (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jul-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | 3412 / 3413 / 3414
|
|
New pocket money football sets £1.99 in Britain (£2.98 for 2 in Wollies sale) finally I can get the goalkeeper (3413) torso to use as a blue version of the fright knight armour without spending loadsa dosh whoohoo -- James (who is gonna run out of (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jul-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Duplo Figure Causes Injury. Help Sought From Parents/LEGO.
|
|
So, being the rotten LEGO parent I am, I gave my daughter one of her Bob the Builder sets today (I couldn't wait...er, I couldn't make HER wait...ya, that's it...until her birthday next week). It was "Bob, Lofty and the Mice. A wonderful set, to be (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jul-01, to lugnet.duplo, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Packaging / Boxes
|
|
"Bert Waters" <lhwaters@hsc.vcu.edu> wrote in message news:GGBuFA.Ezt@lugnet.com... (...) [snip] (...) The (...) in (...) have (...) out (...) the (...) was (...) course (...) and a (...) I am of the "recycle the box almost immediately" faith. The (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jul-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Packaging / Boxes
|
|
My favorite old box is from (URL) , the Classic Space All Terrain Vehicle. It is still in faithful use today, holding crisp instructions for my original space and town collections. When I got back into Lego a few years ago, I was torn as to what to (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jul-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Guarded Inn Gone???
|
|
(...) Ut-Oh... Item#: 10000 Ages: 6+ Pieces: 246 Price: USD No list price Not Available Hey! LD! What's up? Matt (23 years ago, 12-Jul-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Australia and Shop@Home
|
|
Dear LEGO, please enable Australia as an option in your amazing S@H on-line store as soon as possible. Spare parts/service packs are no longer (minimal) available from TLC in Australia and I speak for many Australian AFOL's when I say that we would (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jul-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Packaging / Boxes
|
|
(...) I wish the boxes were as compact as they were in the late 70's and early 80's. I guess "size sells" now, so they fill 'em full of air. You go back and look at the size of a box for a 600 or a 6803, and man they are tiny! I've seen bigger (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jul-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Packaging / Boxes
|
|
(...) "Playing with the sets"?? *sets*??? I'm confused. You mean you kept the individual bricks sorted by what set they came in? Even when I was a kid, all a Lego set was to me was a parts pack. I've always felt an obligation to build the set once, (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Packaging / Boxes
|
|
(...) I agree with Tom. I also appreciate the artwork on the good quality boxes. The box to me is a part of the product. I keep all of my boxes and store them in the hot hot attic while I store plastic in a climate controlled closet. I have reboxed (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Packaging / Boxes
|
|
"William R Ward" <bill@wards.net> wrote in message news:m2vgkzxm8x.fsf@...iew.com... (...) I disagree. I was a kid who bought LEGO as well. I stored them in boxes that they came in as long as I could, meaning, opening & closing them every week (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Packaging / Boxes
|
|
(...) I'm sorry but I have to disagree. LEGO should keep its costs down, and its primary consumer audience in mind: kids. Kids don't care about keeping boxes, as a rule; they just want to play with the bricks. Collectors of whole sets are a very (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Packaging / Boxes
|
|
I'll second that. -Suz (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Packaging / Boxes
|
|
Dear LEGO Hello. I'm a 29 year old LEGO fiend who has bought a house with a large basement just to set up his collection that has spanned my entire life. I am moving to this new home this weekend. I have been packing for weeks, and I am very (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet Another S@H Catalog Observation
|
|
(...) <yooper> Eh, dey go to da bar, yah? Or dey go huntin. Or go to da bar get good an dronk an den go huntin. Oh yah! Dat dere's a tirty- pointer...an he's pink! *hic* </yooper> (Sorry for trotting out the stereotype, but I *am* just another (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jul-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.loc.us.mi, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet Another S@H Catalog Observation
|
|
(...) Oh-no, Rhode Island's missing, and NC & SC are now "Carolinia" Josh (I better stop looking...) (23 years ago, 7-Jul-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
