Subject:
|
Re: A question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Wed, 22 Mar 2000 04:23:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1924 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle, Shiri Dori writes:
> In lugnet.castle, Jeff Stembel writes:
> > In lugnet.castle, Shiri Dori writes:
> > > In lugnet.castle, Jeff Stembel writes:
> > > > Personally, I see little point with the "grunt" minifigs. ;)
> > >
> > > Huh? Which grunt minifigs? Bulls?
> >
> > All. :) Basically, any standard soldiers...
>
> Still don't follow you. I meant to ask, whaddaya mean by grunt minifigs? Who's
> grunting?!
Ooohh... Oops!! :) A "grunt" is the nameless, facesless front line soldier
of an army. They basically have no purpose but to fight on the front lines.
In certain instances, they are refered to as "Cannon Fodder". ;) These terms
are often used in Wargaming and Role Playing. If you still have questions,
email me and I'll try to explain it more in-depth. :)
> > > > Y'know, right know I'm leaning towards making 6081 King's Mountain Fortress
> > > > my second favorite castle... :) It makes me wonder why some people
> > > > dislike it so much...
> > >
> > > Second... after what? (375?)
> >
> > 6080 King's castle. :) It was in your survey...
>
> Well, there was alot of stuff on my survey... you can't expect me to
> remember 'em all, can ya?
Ummm... Yeah? j/k... Sorry. :)
> > Oh, you mean the different types have different faces?
>
> Well... sort of. even that'd be better than total clones.
> But what I meant was that each soldier (not each *type*) would have a
> different face, or a different feather, or color, etc. Forestmen come close,
> but I'd like more face variety. It doesn't have to be too much - just a smirk
> on one, a scratch/scar on another one's face... something to differentiate,
> y'know? I hate it when they all look the same, AND are way too defined. Then
> they are simply clones and nothing more-- I don't like those AT ALL.
But then you can't refer to them as "grunts" anymore... ;)
> > Sorry, I meant to say that there are a few types (like six or seven), and the
> > rest differ only in the color and shape of the feather.
>
> Yeah - that's what I meant too ;-)
> I think that's what makes me like them - they can be personalized/customized
> without being too different from their army (eg I can have a blue archer and a
> red archer, they might be on the same unit, and they'd look enough alike to
> realize that. But OTOH they would have personal attributes, which allow you to
> pick them out of a whole group.)
Ah, okay. :) I like the forestmen and wolfpack to be slightly different just
to give them a rag-tag look... None are the same because there is no real
orgainzation and uniform. :)
> I hope that makes my point clearer...
Yup. :)
Jeff
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: A question
|
| (...) Oh-- OH! I get it now... I understand things very fast when I'm explained to verrrrry slooooowly.... :-) (...) LOL! "Whaddaya mean, you don't remember?!?!" (...) ...again, I like the smiley face "grunt"s (eg falcons) much better than (in my (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A question
|
| (...) Still don't follow you. I meant to ask, whaddaya mean by grunt minifigs? Who's grunting?! <moan... groan... grunt...?! ;-> (...) Well, there was alot of stuff on my survey... you can't expect me to remember 'em all, can ya? (...) Well... sort (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
