Subject:
|
Re: A question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Wed, 22 Mar 2000 03:06:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1884 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle, Jeff Stembel writes:
> In lugnet.castle, Shiri Dori writes:
> > In lugnet.castle, Jeff Stembel writes:
> > > Personally, I see little point with the "grunt" minifigs. ;)
> >
> > Huh? Which grunt minifigs? Bulls?
>
> All. :) Basically, any standard soldiers...
Still don't follow you. I meant to ask, whaddaya mean by grunt minifigs? Who's
grunting?!
<moan... groan... grunt...?! ;->
> > > > > > If I had a choice between having the 6091 KK figs or older figs
> > > > > > instead... I think I might choose KK.
> > > > >
> > > > > I might - the princess, queen, and chainmail guy are awesome - unless the
> > > > > older 'figs in question were one of the other sets that had a female (like
> > > > > the King's Mountain Fortress - Castle Chick *and* removable armor!)
> > >
> > > Y'know, right know I'm leaning towards making 6081 King's Mountain Fortress
> > > my second favorite castle... :) It makes me wonder why some people dislike
> > > it so much...
> >
> > Second... after what? (375?)
>
> 6080 King's castle. :) It was in your survey...
Well, there was alot of stuff on my survey... you can't expect me to
remember 'em all, can ya?
> > > > Oh yah... but that's an exception, y'know. Most of the older sets just had
> > > > repeating clones... at least they were smiley clones tho', you could
> > > > pretend
> > > > they had different faces ;-)
> > >
> > > I like clones... They make a very impressive army! :)
> >
> > That's not what I meant. I like clones too - to a certain degree. I wish TLC
> > would make "clone" soldiers that each had a *different* face... or at least
> > some had different faces. Like in the FK for example.
>
> Oh, you mean the different types have different faces?
Well... sort of. even that'd be better than total clones.
But what I meant was that each soldier (not each *type*) would have a
different face, or a different feather, or color, etc. Forestmen come close,
but I'd like more face variety. It doesn't have to be too much - just a smirk
on one, a scratch/scar on another one's face... something to differentiate,
y'know? I hate it when they all look the same, AND are way too defined. Then
they are simply clones and nothing more-- I don't like those AT ALL.
> > > > BTW, if the figs were dark[forest]men, I'd take them over the 6091s any
> > > > day... I want lots of these... they offer enough variety (IMO) without
> > > > being
> > > > unrelated to each other. You can recognize a forestman like that <snaps
> > > > fingers> but each and every one of them is different... check out the
> > > > fibblesnork guide, there are, like, 40 different ones. Sheesh.
> > >
> > > Yeah, but the differences are resigned to feather size and color. That
> > > never
> > > really meant anything to me...
> >
> > Well... there are quite a few different ones. Like the baggie torso, the
> > armor
> > torso, and then the whole dark forest line had other torsos.
>
> Sorry, I meant to say that there are a few types (like six or seven), and the
> rest differ only in the color and shape of the feather.
Yeah - that's what I meant too ;-)
I think that's what makes me like them - they can be personalized/customized
without being too different from their army (eg I can have a blue archer and a
red archer, they might be on the same unit, and they'd look enough alike to
realize that. But OTOH they would have personal attributes, which allow you to
pick them out of a whole group.)
I hope that makes my point clearer...
-Shiri
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: A question
|
| (...) Ooohh... Oops!! :) A "grunt" is the nameless, facesless front line soldier of an army. They basically have no purpose but to fight on the front lines. In certain instances, they are refered to as "Cannon Fodder". ;) These terms are often used (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.castle)
| | | Re: A question
|
| (...) Grunt is slang for a group of people. They do manual labour, are easy to train. They are usually soldiers. They are an unlimitless resource, and make up the base of any army. They are the mighty FOOTMAN!! <<KM>> (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A question
|
| (...) All. :) Basically, any standard soldiers... (...) 6080 King's castle. :) It was in your survey... (...) Oh, you mean the different types have different faces? (...) Sorry, I meant to say that there are a few types (like six or seven), and the (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
