Subject:
|
Re: who is the castle curator???
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 22:37:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
747 times
|
| |
|
|
Hi Matt,
I understand and respect your statements.
I even value your prudence…
It jus’ that, the way I see it, the advantages of having a
‘care-taker’ out ways the odds of preferential treatment
or the remote development of a hierarchy!
(Just an honest question: Has this happened before in other groups?)
No matter what possible struggles-of-power ensues, Suz
will always have veto-authority, and the good citizens of
our democratic group will ensure (Power-to-the-People)
that equilibrium will return thanks to the checks and balances
of the constituency. (I really do believe that if anyone gets
preferential treatment, enough individuals will show their qualms.)
Thus, I think we should still proceed, but only as long as those
in power are trusted and respect members who we have faith in.
--==Richard==--
(It’s not like we’re jus’ handin’ the torch to ‘anyone!’
Ben and Jeff are ‘good-peoples’ in my book!)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: who is the castle curator???
|
| (...) Good to hear. (...) I don't think at lugnet, anyhow...(or least that I can honestly recall :) (...) Hmm...Perhaps I may have overlooked that given fact. As long as the curator is a trustworthy person, and contributes to the overall state of (...) (22 years ago, 10-Nov-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: who is the castle curator???
|
| In lugnet.admin.curators, Richard Noeckel writes: Heh..I knew my opinion would arise some manner of contreversy. Not surprising. (...) Not exactly to that proportion...although I can sense your sarcasm. (...) Maybe not if you're a dual theme poster. (...) (22 years ago, 9-Nov-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
33 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
