Subject:
|
Re: Rate the factions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Fri, 13 Sep 2002 16:53:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
418 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle, Saskia van Doesburg writes:
>
> I can tell when you have done it (and since I'm
> > posting this, guess what someone has done).
> >
> > Bruce
>
> I think I did, but I really didn't mean to.
> Maybe it was easier if you could rank the figs from high to low. Now I gave
> my favourite themes 10 points and the themes I didn't care about zero or
> didn't rate them at all, but I didn't expect that that would mean that I
> gave them 0 points.
I thought people would find it a pain to rank that many factions and keep
track of where they placed them. Further, I thought ranking might create
some artificially large gaps.
Perhaps the rating option needs a "No opinion" or perhaps the default should
be set to average (5). If anyone has yet to take the poll, go take a look
at the figs you aren't familiar with, or please rate the faction you aren't
familiar with as a 5.
>
> At first I thought it would go like; favourite fig 10 points, least
> favourite fig 0 points.
>
> I'm a huge castle fan, but I don't know all the theme's by name (and also,
> english is not my native language). So I ranked only the themes I was sure
> of, and the ones I like.
> Sorry, didn't mean to mess up.
This is a function of the system, rather than abuse. No apology needed.
Thanks for the explanation, though!
Bruce
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Rate the factions
|
| I can tell when you have done it (and since I'm (...) I think I did, but I really didn't mean to. Maybe it was easier if you could rank the figs from high to low. Now I gave my favourite themes 10 points and the themes I didn't care about zero or (...) (22 years ago, 13-Sep-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
