Subject:
|
Re: Rate the factions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Thu, 12 Sep 2002 22:11:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
410 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle, David Eaton writes:
> In lugnet.castle, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> > In lugnet.castle, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> > > Yes, another poll. Unlike my Castle poll, this is a rate the faction, not
> > > rank the faction. Rate just the minifigs from each series, not the actual sets.
> > >
> > > http://members.lugnet.com/polls/ballots/?n=80
> >
> > Feel free to include the horse bardings as part of the minifigs since that
> > is usually very faction-specific.
>
> Interesting-- most themes I rated pretty similarly to the voters (so far--
> of course that means only 12 voters at the moment), the two big exceptions
> being Crusaders and Wolfpack. I was less than 1 point away from the "actual"
> vote when rating 7 of the themes, and between 1 and 2 points away from
> rating the rest-- the one exception being Wolfpack, which I grossly
> underrated (I was never a huge fan of Wolfpack figs). Crusaders was the
> opposite (though not as far off). I guess I must like these guys more than
> most :)
My votes were a little off the main, because I tended to vote
"generic-looking" higher and "theme-specific" lower. I also have a weird
bias in that themes with proper heraldry got rated higher in my vote. ;)
James
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Rate the factions
|
| (...) Interesting-- most themes I rated pretty similarly to the voters (so far-- of course that means only 12 voters at the moment), the two big exceptions being Crusaders and Wolfpack. I was less than 1 point away from the "actual" vote when rating (...) (22 years ago, 12-Sep-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
