Subject:
|
Re: Rate the factions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Thu, 12 Sep 2002 22:05:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
582 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> In lugnet.castle, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> > Yes, another poll. Unlike my Castle poll, this is a rate the faction, not
> > rank the faction. Rate just the minifigs from each series, not the actual sets.
> >
> > http://members.lugnet.com/polls/ballots/?n=80
>
> Feel free to include the horse bardings as part of the minifigs since that
> is usually very faction-specific.
Interesting-- most themes I rated pretty similarly to the voters (so far--
of course that means only 12 voters at the moment), the two big exceptions
being Crusaders and Wolfpack. I was less than 1 point away from the "actual"
vote when rating 7 of the themes, and between 1 and 2 points away from
rating the rest-- the one exception being Wolfpack, which I grossly
underrated (I was never a huge fan of Wolfpack figs). Crusaders was the
opposite (though not as far off). I guess I must like these guys more than
most :)
DaveE
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Rate the factions
|
| (...) My votes were a little off the main, because I tended to vote "generic-looking" higher and "theme-specific" lower. I also have a weird bias in that themes with proper heraldry got rated higher in my vote. ;) James (22 years ago, 12-Sep-02, to lugnet.castle)
| | | Re: Rate the factions
|
| (...) Most of mine were very different from the results. Part of that probably comes from that fact that I rated Fright Knights high due to two of the soldiers, which are pretty much my favorites. :) I'm suprised Royal Knights is so low, actually... (...) (22 years ago, 12-Sep-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
Message is in Reply To:
16 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
