 | | 2002’s good for Castle! —Richard Noeckel
|
| | | ^^^2002’s good for Castle!^^^ These pens have `wicked` potential for ‘Army-Building!’ (unless they’re some how *anchored-down?) That Jango Fett is gonna be bought in multiples! (URL) Potter always comes through with dynamic shields in its sets. The (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: 2002's good for Castle! —Aaron Muhl
|
| | | | | Which pens exactly do you think would be cool for castle? The picture I looked at had Darth Vader, Jango Fett, C3PO, R2-D2, a Clonetrooper, and a jedi I think.... The oval serpant shield looks awesome! But you only get 1 in a $10 set? The body armor (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 2002's good for Castle! —Leonard Hoffman
|
| | | | | | | (...) i agree with you here. these brand new 2002 sets, although somewhat neat, leave me feeling destitute about the future of lego castle. I mean, the first ever lego minifig set was the yellow castle and now.. ugh, there's nothing. except Guarded (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 2002's good for Castle! —Richard Noeckel
|
| | | | | | (...) (URL) new Clone-Warz Troopers (Pen) has a pretty neat helmet! Reminiscent of the old 6075 visors (therefore, I'm likely to get 4) (URL) the one I most anticipate is the Jango Fett (Pen). =) His helmet/backpack combination is gonna look great (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 2002's good for Castle! —Kevin Johnston
|
| | | | | | | (...) Don't get excited yet. Most of the pen parts released to date are not compatible compatible with System elements. From the pictures, most of these are definitely the existing, incompatible parts style (look at the stud on top of the square (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Clones? [was Re: 2002's good for Castle!] —Thomas Garrison
|
| | | | | | (...) really do look a lot like Yellow Castle helmets, both in the brush on top and in the shape of the eye-slit. Can anyone who actually owns a clonetrooper comment on the similarity, or the appropriateness of the mold? From what I can see, a (...) (23 years ago, 30-Apr-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Clones? [was Re: 2002's good for Castle!] —Leanne Opaskar
|
| | | | | | Waay back when, I had a yellow castle. *le sigh* My folks gave it away. Waah. ): The helmets in the yellow castle set were actually two pieces. One was the visor with the crest, and the rest was the helmet. So you could flip up the visor and see the (...) (23 years ago, 1-May-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: 2002’s good for Castle! —Jay Rodarte
|
| | | | Richard, You are right, the Serpent Sheild is awesome. Is that supposed to be the Slytherin Entrance to their dorm room? Also Crabbe, and goyle look great! I saw Madam Hooch. She was kewl! But they could have done better with the Quidditch Field. (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2002’s good for Castle! —Benjamin Medinets
|
| | | | | (...) As far as the quidditch (practise) field...it isn't too bad, and it has enough elements to make it work, if you buy two of them, make the make shift stands, and use some kind of base for the "field". I think the "crabbe and goyle set" will be (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2002’s good for Castle! —Jason Cicchini
|
| | | | Not only are the SW and HP sets looking awesome, but check out the better shots of the Monsters sets! #1380 werewolf ambush: (URL) curse of the pharoah (URL) vampire's crypt (URL) scary lab: (URL) sets look amazing! I'm dying to get my hands on the (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2002’s good for Castle! —Richie Dulin
|
| | | | | In lugnet.castle, Jason Cicchini writes: [snip] (...) minifig head.... (Not that that would make it any smaller... but it might make it more practical/versatile); Cheers Richie Dulin (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 2002’s good for Castle! —John Rudy
|
| | | | | | (...) If it is two piece, just take the flat-top off Dr. Frankenstein and there ya go. I still like the zipper on his forehead though... -John Rudy (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 2002’s good for Castle! —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | (...) It does look like a separate piece from the head. Still, it could have been made a little smaller. Frank (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2002’s good for Castle! —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | | | (...) Since the Spiderman sets are based on the upcomig movie and not the comic, you'll want to direct your complaints there, rather than at Lego. Jeff (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 2002’s good for Castle! —Jason Cicchini
|
| | | | | | (...) I realize this, however TLC is responsibe for the Lego sets of the movie, therefore my complaints are directed correctly. I'm sure Sony Entertainment didn't say "Could you make Green Goblin's head three times the size of his body? Thanks." (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 2002’s good for Castle! —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | | | | (...) It isn't "three times the size of his body." I'd say it is little more than 20% larger than a regular minifig head. I can't comment on how it looks compared to either the movie or the comic, since I have seen neither, nor do I plan to. (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 2002’s good for Castle! —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | | | | (...) Okay, a little follow-up: A friend showed me a pic, and the minifig head looks like a pretty good representation of the character's head. Is it a bit wide? Sure, but minifigs THEMSELVES are a bit wide. Jeff (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 2002’s good for Castle! —Jason Cicchini
|
| | | | | | (...) It is a good representation, but wouldn't you rather have a minifig head, instead of this helmet thing? Don't get me wrong, though, I see some uses for it. I just think it looks a bit absurd, as well as the frankenstein's monster hat peice (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 2002’s good for Castle! —Magnus Lauglo
|
| | | | | | (...) much time and work go into each of these minifigs, but who would even spend $15-20 on a single minifig? Magnus (23 years ago, 12-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2002’s good for Castle! —Kevin Johnston
|
| | | | | (...) Have you seen the Goblin from the movie? That IS what these sets are based on. My guess is it's removable (i.e. fits over a minifig head). Kevin (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 2002’s good for Castle! —Kevin Johnston
|
| | | | | | (...) Never mind. Somehow glanced past the other follow-ups. Personally, I don't mind the size, because I'm a sucker for removable helmets, and a sculpted head in the movie style wouldn't be very useful to me anyway (too mechanical-looking to pass (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 2002’s good for Castle! —Richard Noeckel
|
| | | | | | (...) [sorry for the insanely long link below] (URL) what do you know! The Green Goblin just might have a mask!!! (and I was so sure before that the head was one solid element) If you espy closely @ the jaw-line you’ll be able to discern what (...) (23 years ago, 12-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 2002’s good for Castle! —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | | | (...) new pics on it, and Galidor still looks to be firmly in "sucks" territory. best LFB (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 2002’s good for Castle! —Richard Noeckel
|
| | | | | | | (...) (URL) excellent coverage over @ ASM! Thanx for referin’ us!!! =) ?Just one question… Did Lego cast the same minifig ‘actor’ to play both -Werewolf victim #1- and the -Green Goblin- ?????? (URL) the ‘zact same face?!?!? (...) Oh, and yes… the (...) (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 2002’s good for Castle! —Kevin Wilson
|
| | | | | | | Mr L F Braun wrote in message ... (...) territory. OMG - look here though: (URL) building... another bank... with the door *printed on* a JS panel. Arrggghhhh! Kevin ---...--- TOWN Lego Building contest! (URL) Hospital 2396 piece kit! (URL) Lego (...) (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.town)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: 2002’s good for Castle! —Jonathan Lopes
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Depending on the price though, from the 2nd story up this set has some good parts. (grey windows, grey log bricks etc.) The fig's always move easily on ebay too. That printed on door is inexcusable though. Jonathan (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.town)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: 2002’s good for Castle! —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Even worse, the printed design has images of lego pieces! Steve (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.town)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: 2002’s good for Castle! —Chris Maddison
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) Ooh...that's gotta be some kind of new low. "We can't give you the bricks, but here's what they look like"... ugh. -Chris (23 years ago, 16-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.town)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: 2002’s good for Castle! —Aaron Sneary
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I'm fairly certain from the picture that the bank front is NOT a JS panel, but a endless-loop similar to the backdrop from the Studios helicopter set 1351. Still not terribly useful, but not really a 'brick' either. (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.town)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: 2002 —Timothy Carl Buchheim
|
| | | | | | | | (...) no, I don't think it's an endless loop.. it looks to me like a piece of cardboard, held up by the Jack Stone pieces with vertical slots. The vampire set has the same sort of thing. -- Tim Buchheim (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.town)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 2002 —Timothy Carl Buchheim
|
| | | | | | (...) I'll be buying a bunch of those... -- Tim Buchheim (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 2002 —Kevin Knoot
|
| | | | | | (...) Hey, and that looks like a gray Bat Helm. (URL) the most exciting castle piece, for sure, but whaddya do? (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2002’s good for Castle! —Felix Greco
|
| | | | Hey, does anyone know when the new vampire, werewolf, etc sets will be selling?? Thanks for any info. Felix (23 years ago, 4-Mar-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| | | | |
