|
 | | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| Here's some renders I've done as a result of this thread: (URL) render times ranged from 1.5 to 3.5 hours on a 1.7 GHz PC. I'm slowly working on an include file for color definitions. (...) (22 years ago, 20-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|  
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.046)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| i do see what you mean. it seems as if my colors are always a little dark using the lgeo librarys, but the detail makes up for it, and photoshop usually gets it to where i can live with it. -tk "Fredrik Glöckner" <fredrigl@math.uio.no> wrote in (...) (22 years ago, 3-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.045)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| no, its been renamed the autokickasstweak button. seriously I want a step by step tutorial on this image. I like how the shadows are so dull, the seems are invisible, subtle reflections, depth of field, could I go on and on... hell yeah. I'd pay for (...) (22 years ago, 3-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.045)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| "Orion Pobursky" <bilthefish@IHATESPAMyahoo.com> skrev i meddelandet news:H2r5CJ.25A@lugnet.com... (...) - Make sure you don't have any lights on (you've probably already done this) - Play with the 'assumed_gamma' value (higher value, darker (...) (22 years ago, 22-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.045)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| what does this mean? Then I ran it through L3P: (...) Does this have something do with the lighting? -tk "Lars C. Hassing" <lch@ccieurope.com> wrote in message news:H1u4vC.793@lugnet.com... (...) to quality. (...) (22 years ago, 3-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.044)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| this is incredible. I will not rest until my rederings look this sweet. -tk "Trond Hasse Lie" <lietro@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:H1GKI4.8K7@lugnet.com... (...) (22 years ago, 1-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.044)
|
|
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.043)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| (...) Lars, you have made my week with this posting! I wanted to thank you for pursuing this project, getting help from the big guns. These results are sooooo pretty and very encouraging. (...) Indeed. Other renderers may have an edge in creating (...) (22 years ago, 6-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.043)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| "Coby Bassett" <coby@tubafrog.com> skrev i meddelandet news:H2LqHH.Hzo@lugnet.com... (...) test (...) pieces. (...) Hmm, I've made some tests too, but not seen anything like what you describe. Veeerrryyy slow to render with radiosity, though, and a (...) (22 years ago, 18-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.043)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| (...) If you haven't already, check the link that Lars C Hassing posted to the POV-Ray users' forum. The "JRG" person posted his custom colour and finish declarations there. It's interesting to note that he achieves the effect by disposing of the (...) (22 years ago, 10-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.042)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| (...) like a photo if the polygons weren't visible. I checked and povray has an option for smooth shaded polygons but the exporting program would have to calculate the normal vectors for it to work. (22 years ago, 9-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.042)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering... (need new l3p)
|
| (...) Gotta love the radiosity pics! So the big question now is how close is the next release of l3p? You know, the one that supports all this on the command line with -ib -ie -il and -ci as mentioned in this thread. (URL) can't wait. Don (22 years ago, 20-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.042)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| (...) According to the L3P page, it does. However, this might not work with LGEO colors. --Travis Cobbs (tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com) (22 years ago, 6-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.041)
|
|
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.041)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| Just wanted to add my 2 cents about the wonderful images that have been posted. I use Bryce for to render my images. Here are two links to images that make use of a modified light dome technique that was posted to Renderosity.com to simulate (...) (22 years ago, 10-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.040)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| (...) I don't think I said that. At least it was not my intension. What I meant to say was that the standard colour/surface definitions in L3P / LGEO need some tweaking to get those results. Fredrik (22 years ago, 3-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.040)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| (...) renderings is to work more on the surface/colour definition within POV-Ray. The one which are the default from LGEO or L3P are probably not the optimal ones. With all due respect to the authors, of course! I don't mean to belittle their work, (...) (22 years ago, 3-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.039)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| (...) was what was holding the yellow mini-fig up in the air. :-) I think it qualifies as a quite realistic image. You might want to look into the blur around the black mini-fig. It looks a bit strange on the white background. Play well, Jacob (22 years ago, 7-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.039)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| (...) Read the LDraw FAQ! On the page: (URL) can read that for the colour "silver" you should use the LDraw colour number 383. Play well, Jacob -- Sal Colibri (from Roger Leloup's "Yoko Tsuno"): (URL) (22 years ago, 7-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.039)
|
|
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.039)
|
