Ray-Tracing : 2232


CAD / Ray-Tracing / 2232	2231 \| 2233

Subject:	Re: Gamma correction (was Re: color, contrast and brightness problems - any idea?)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.cad.ray
Date:	Thu, 13 May 2004 04:29:09 GMT
Viewed:	2256 times

So why does my monitor come in at about 1.7 on the first chart, and 2.4 on the second? I’ll accept that the second makes it far easier to find the best match, but I won’t accept that my estimate is off by 0.7 on the first chart. There’s absolutely no way my monitor is over 2 on that chart, and 1.7 really looks like the best match.

--Travis Cobbs

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Gamma correction (was Re: color, contrast and brightness problems - any idea?)
(...) Well, I found both of those charts off of google, so i don't know which one is more accurate. At the risk of confusing things even more, I found another page with a similar test: (URL). I believe this one is accurate, since he give the formula (...) (20 years ago, 14-May-04, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Gamma correction (was Re: color, contrast and brightness problems - any idea?)
(...) Here's a better chart: (URL) I found it at this site, which also has some interesting info: (URL) Andy (20 years ago, 12-May-04, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)

8 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search