Subject:
|
Re: Improving the Parts Tracker experience
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Wed, 12 Nov 2003 21:41:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
392 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Steve Bliss wrote:
> I'll start out with items that have been brought up recently:
>
> - In the Queue, don't list files I've already reviewed.
This would be good, as long as it *does* show them when the file has been
resubmitted and the votes deleted.
> - Provide a checkbox on the file submission page for authors to choose either "feel
> free to make fixes to this file" or "please let me know if you find problems with
> this file".
I like this one.
> - Change the file status calculation, so that files go into "has uncertified
> subfiles" status only after they have enough votes for admin review.
I like this too.
> - Hide the certified and admin-review files from the parts list page (with an option
> to show them). Or move them to the bottom of the list, with 'hold' files.
I think if anything, this should *show* them by default, with the option to
*hide* them. That is for all the non-author/reviewers out there, who just want
to use the parts tracker to look for unofficial files. Hiding by default would
confuse the h*ll out of them.
In addition, I'd like to see more detail included in the parts tracker updates
e-mail. Mostly, I'd like it to include the file title, and a picture of the
part. Additionally, it would be nice to include any comments that were
submitted with the vote.
Andy
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Improving the Parts Tracker experience
|
| (...) What changes/improvements would anyone like to see on the PT to make it easier to slog through the 1500 files currently out there? I'm open to any ideas at this point - reiterate old ideas, bring up new ones. But think about what pages, (...) (21 years ago, 11-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
33 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
