Subject:
|
Improving the Parts Tracker experience
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Tue, 11 Nov 2003 12:49:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
321 times
|
| |
|
|
In another thread, Franklin wrote:
> ... the number of files on the Tracker is so high,
> that it's becoming (*exponentially*) more difficult to track
> which parts you've already reviewed, and which you want to
> review.
What changes/improvements would anyone like to see on the PT to make it easier to
slog through the 1500 files currently out there?
I'm open to any ideas at this point - reiterate old ideas, bring up new ones. But
think about what pages, options, functions you'd like the PT to give you. I'm more
interested in ways the PT can work with the data it already has, rather than changing
the data (ie, adding more checkboxes and options and etc). This is simply because
changing the presentation is lower-impact than changing the data. But I am willing
to consider anything.
I'll start out with items that have been brought up recently:
- In the Queue, don't list files I've already reviewed.
- Provide a checkbox on the file submission page for authors to choose either "feel
free to make fixes to this file" or "please let me know if you find problems with
this file".
- Change the file status calculation, so that files go into "has uncertified
subfiles" status only after they have enough votes for admin review.
- Hide the certified and admin-review files from the parts list page (with an option
to show them). Or move them to the bottom of the list, with 'hold' files.
Steve
|
|
Message has 6 Replies:
 | | Re: Improving the Parts Tracker experience
|
| (...) Franklin suggested this one a while back: A 'Parts I Have Not Reviewed' page Some of my own: A filter for MyReviews that show only those parts initially submitted by the user. Allow users to edit the header of those parts they initially (...) (21 years ago, 12-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | Re: Improving the Parts Tracker experience
|
| (...) "do not even consider to make the slightest change to this file - even if it got 5 hold-votes, hangs in the PT for more than 3 years and looks like an orphan!!!" ROFL - allowing authors to reply to a reviewers comment without the need to (...) (21 years ago, 12-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | Re: Improving the Parts Tracker experience
|
| (...) ...[same as]... (...) Yes. (Heh, big surprise, my liking this one. ;) (...) That's good, too. (...) I like this. (...) Yes!! (...) Oh, [*BLEEP*], YES!! (Who do I have to kill to get this one? >;) Here's some more: An option that sorts all (...) (21 years ago, 12-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | Re: Improving the Parts Tracker experience
|
| (...) This would be good, as long as it *does* show them when the file has been resubmitted and the votes deleted. (...) I like this one. (...) I like this too. (...) I think if anything, this should *show* them by default, with the option to *hide* (...) (21 years ago, 12-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | Re: Improving the Parts Tracker experience
|
| I would suggest that when you click on a part from the tracker list that it would open up in a new window so that the list would still be available in the other window. The list takes a long time to load and each time you go from a part back to the (...) (21 years ago, 13-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | Re: Improving the Parts Tracker experience
|
| (...) A couple more, with some overlap. - Add a checkbox to the submit & review pages, to flag an item as needing admin attention. - Add a function to send email to other PT users, without exposing other users addresses. Need this both as a stand (...) (21 years ago, 19-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
33 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
