Subject:
|
Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Wed, 7 May 2003 11:15:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2563 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Tim Courtney writes:
> > > I'd rather the LSC be selected by people who are familiar with
> > > the other programmers and potential members, as
> > > well as the issues the LSC will be dealing with. I think this is a very
> > > important concern, which minimizes the risk of the LSC being a dud if
> > > non-technically inclined LDraw.org members cast votes for who should be on
> > > the LSC. A handful of people have expressed this idea to me.
> >
> > I'm actually half and half on it. I do see reasons why to limit it, but
> > for some reason I'm a little wary of accepting it without discussion.
there are reasons why I put stress on a restriction.
http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dev/org/ldraw/?n=2356
it took me almost a year to get a deeper understanding
of the stuff I was dealing with and feel comfortable with cond. line,
BFC, bad vertex sequences and the like. 'til one hasn't struggled
with the code it's nearly impossible to be aware of its limitation or
in which way it should be expanded. part designer use to know each
other (or at least their work) and know who will bring the whole
story to a happy ending.
w.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
50 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
