To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 2494
2493  |  2495
Subject: 
Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Tue, 8 Jul 2003 22:20:22 GMT
Viewed: 
8036 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Tim Courtney wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Steve Bliss writes:
> > In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Tim Courtney wrote:
> > 
> > > Cool. Anyone else care to add their .02?
> > 
> > I feel voting for LSC members should be open to the general group.  I've
> > got 2 reasons for this:
> > 
> > 1. I trust people enough that they'll deal with their own capabilities
> > for discernment in this area.
> > 2. I don't want to have to sort out who gets to vote, and who doesn't.
> > I'm guessing there are people who are qualified to select the LSC
> > members, even though they might not fit the outline we've described for
> > eligibility.
> 
> I see your points and agree with 2 and 3, but only partially with 1.
> 
> Anyways, there's about equal response for or against limitations. Not
> totally sure on what to do - I'll let it simmer for a bit.

Well, it's simmered a bit. There's been no outcry one way or another. I think
for simplicity's sake, the proposal should change to allow anyone to vote for
who is on the LSC, not just those who are LSC eligible. I don't think the stakes
are high enough to need that measure, given the current climate of the
community.

Does anyone agree? Does anyone object?

> (I should note that if there was no limitation on who could vote for the LSC
> members, I would be able to vote, and if there were, I would not)

And ... as noted, this does gain me a vote where I wouldn't have had one.

-Tim



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
 
(...) I agree. Everyone should be able to vote. (...) Well, I think we could make an exception to the rule on this point ... ;) Steve (23 years ago, 8-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
 
(...) I see your points and agree with 2 and 3, but only partially with 1. Anyways, there's about equal response for or against limitations. Not totally sure on what to do - I'll let it simmer for a bit. (I should note that if there was no (...) (23 years ago, 13-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

50 Messages in This Thread:
















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR