To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 2494
2493  |  2495
Subject: 
Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Tue, 8 Jul 2003 22:20:22 GMT
Viewed: 
2928 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Tim Courtney wrote:
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Steve Bliss writes:
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Tim Courtney wrote:

Cool. Anyone else care to add their .02?

I feel voting for LSC members should be open to the general group.  I've
got 2 reasons for this:

1. I trust people enough that they'll deal with their own capabilities
for discernment in this area.
2. I don't want to have to sort out who gets to vote, and who doesn't.
I'm guessing there are people who are qualified to select the LSC
members, even though they might not fit the outline we've described for
eligibility.

I see your points and agree with 2 and 3, but only partially with 1.

Anyways, there's about equal response for or against limitations. Not
totally sure on what to do - I'll let it simmer for a bit.

Well, it's simmered a bit. There's been no outcry one way or another. I think
for simplicity's sake, the proposal should change to allow anyone to vote for
who is on the LSC, not just those who are LSC eligible. I don't think the stakes
are high enough to need that measure, given the current climate of the
community.

Does anyone agree? Does anyone object?

(I should note that if there was no limitation on who could vote for the LSC
members, I would be able to vote, and if there were, I would not)

And ... as noted, this does gain me a vote where I wouldn't have had one.

-Tim



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
 
(...) I agree. Everyone should be able to vote. (...) Well, I think we could make an exception to the rule on this point ... ;) Steve (21 years ago, 8-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
 
(...) I see your points and agree with 2 and 3, but only partially with 1. Anyways, there's about equal response for or against limitations. Not totally sure on what to do - I'll let it simmer for a bit. (I should note that if there was no (...) (22 years ago, 13-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

50 Messages in This Thread:
















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR