Subject:
|
Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Tue, 6 May 2003 03:23:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2549 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Dan Boger writes:
> On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 02:36:40AM +0000, Tim Courtney wrote:
> > > you're supporting that only LSC-eligable can vote, or that the ad-hoc
> > > group can vote?
> >
> > Both, but moreso that only LSC-eligable. I'd rather the LSC be selected by
> > people who are familiar with the other programmers and potential members, as
> > well as the issues the LSC will be dealing with. I think this is a very
> > important concern, which minimizes the risk of the LSC being a dud if
> > non-technically inclined LDraw.org members cast votes for who should be on
> > the LSC. A handful of people have expressed this idea to me.
>
> I'm actually half and half on it. I do see reasons why to limit it, but
> for some reason I'm a little wary of accepting it without discussion.
Ok :-)
> > If there's only this one objection to the stipulation that only people
> > eligible to be members of the LSC can vote people into the LSC, I see no
> > reason to remove it. This has been in the draft since version 0.6, and there
> > have been no other objections thus far that I recall seeing (if there have
> > been, feel free to point them out and I will stand corrected).
>
> Well, at least I haven't noticed it before, otherwise I would have
> probably mentioned it. But you're right - my (possible) objection alone
> is not enough to cause a change there. I just want to see if it bothers
> others for the same unknown reason.
Cool. Anyone else care to add their .02?
-Tim
|
|
Message has 5 Replies:
 | | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
| (...) there are reasons why I put stress on a restriction. (URL) took me almost a year to get a deeper understanding of the stuff I was dealing with and feel comfortable with cond. line, BFC, bad vertex sequences and the like. 'til one hasn't (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
| (...) I personally feel the restriction is a good idea. However, playing devil's advocate, I feel obliged to point out that since it would increase my voting power (since I am eligible as a software author), it's in my best interests to be in favor (...) (22 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
| (...) I feel voting for LSC members should be open to the general group. I've got 2 reasons for this: 1. I trust people enough that they'll deal with their own capabilities for discernment in this area. 2. I don't want to have to sort out who gets (...) (22 years ago, 10-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
| (...) I'm actually half and half on it. I do see reasons why to limit it, but for some reason I'm a little wary of accepting it without discussion. (...) Well, at least I haven't noticed it before, otherwise I would have probably mentioned it. But (...) (22 years ago, 6-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
50 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
