To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 2418
2417  |  2419
Subject: 
Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Thu, 8 May 2003 16:40:47 GMT
Viewed: 
2772 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Tim Courtney writes:

Cool. Anyone else care to add their .02?


I personally feel the restriction is a good idea.  However, playing devil's
advocate, I feel obliged to point out that since it would increase my voting
power (since I am eligible as a software author), it's in my best interests
to be in favor of the restriction.

Having said that, I think that if we don't get any strong objections from
the people who would be prevented from voting, it should be left alone.

--Travis Cobbs



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
 
(...) I would be one of those who would be prevented from voting (at least this year), and I don't have a strong objection to not being able to vote. The restriction is designed to make the LSC a technical group voted on by technically involved (...) (22 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
 
(...) Ok :-) (...) Cool. Anyone else care to add their .02? -Tim (22 years ago, 6-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

50 Messages in This Thread:
















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR