To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 2395
2394  |  2396
Subject: 
Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Tue, 6 May 2003 01:11:16 GMT
Viewed: 
6872 times
  
On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 10:38:49PM +0000, Tim Courtney wrote:
> I don't believe the beginning part is new (eligible LSC members can vote) it
> is new, but I added the ad-hoc group in there for those in the ad-hoc who
> are ineligible for LSC membership. Track Changes didn't highlight it in Word.

huh.

> I am for that statement though - it assures only competent people who are
> aware of the issues can decide who decides our standards.

you're supporting that only LSC-eligable can vote, or that the ad-hoc
group can vote?  I think everyone can vote - but if we say that's not
so, then I think the ad-hoc part should be removed.  Why the special
treatment?

On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 10:45:03PM +0000, Tim Courtney wrote:
> That statement (aside from the ad-hoc addition) was in Version 0.6, the
> first version I posted publicly. I found it in my local text file, as well
> as in the post here:
> 
> http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dev/org/ldraw/?n=2304
> 
> I'm strongly in favor of at least restricting the vote to only those
> eligible to be on the LSC, as the original statement read.

Why?  And why the exception to the ad-hoc group?

Dan



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
 
(...) Both, but moreso that only LSC-eligable. I'd rather the LSC be selected by people who are familiar with the other programmers and potential members, as well as the issues the LSC will be dealing with. I think this is a very important concern, (...) (24 years ago, 6-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
 
(...) I don't believe the beginning part is new (eligible LSC members can vote) it is new, but I added the ad-hoc group in there for those in the ad-hoc who are ineligible for LSC membership. Track Changes didn't highlight it in Word. I am for that (...) (24 years ago, 5-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

50 Messages in This Thread:
















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR