To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 2481
2480  |  2482
Subject: 
Re: LSC Proposal 0.99a
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Thu, 3 Jul 2003 04:27:01 GMT
Viewed: 
2208 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Tim Courtney wrote:
[{Requirements for LSC Membership}]¬
To ensure only competent, dedicated, and active contributors are eligible to
become members of the LSC, they shall have met one or more of the following
requirements for nomination:

...

* Served as a reviewer on the Parts Tracker through at least 2 official
  parts updates, and posted at least 5 reviews in at least two updates since
  their initial participation

Since the requirement says we want "active contributors", should this be
clarified to say "5 reviews in each of the last two updates"?  I don't think
that I qualify to be on the LSC, just because I reviewed 20 files back in early
2002.  Does that make sense?

* Authored a software program that is compliant with either the LDraw 0.2.7
  spec or another spec published by the LSC

Does this mean server side software as well, or just end user software?

Also, once we get all the nominations, we should have the ad-hoc committee
publish the complete list of nominees, if they accepted or declined the
nomination, and under what clause do they qualify.  That way, people will know
who they can cast their votes for.

:)

Dan



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: LSC Proposal 0.99a
 
(...) Yes, it makes sense. I think given this point it's best to keep it to people who have reviewed in the last two updates - what does everyone else think? (...) I'd be inclined to say end user, because they're designing for 'dumb' (or 'dumber') (...) (21 years ago, 3-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

Message is in Reply To:
  LSC Proposal 0.99a
 
This is a re-post of the LSC proposal 0.99 with two changes: I removed the stipulation under 'voting' about the ad-hoc committee per (URL) this thread>. I changed the dates for voting from one day (July 20) to five days, July 17-22. This covers both (...) (21 years ago, 1-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)

50 Messages in This Thread:
















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR