Subject:
|
Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Tue, 6 May 2003 02:36:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2295 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Dan Boger writes:
> On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 10:38:49PM +0000, Tim Courtney wrote:
> > I don't believe the beginning part is new (eligible LSC members can vote) it
> > is new, but I added the ad-hoc group in there for those in the ad-hoc who
> > are ineligible for LSC membership. Track Changes didn't highlight it in Word.
>
> huh.
>
> > I am for that statement though - it assures only competent people who are
> > aware of the issues can decide who decides our standards.
>
> you're supporting that only LSC-eligable can vote, or that the ad-hoc
> group can vote?
Both, but moreso that only LSC-eligable. I'd rather the LSC be selected by
people who are familiar with the other programmers and potential members, as
well as the issues the LSC will be dealing with. I think this is a very
important concern, which minimizes the risk of the LSC being a dud if
non-technically inclined LDraw.org members cast votes for who should be on
the LSC. A handful of people have expressed this idea to me.
If there's only this one objection to the stipulation that only people
eligible to be members of the LSC can vote people into the LSC, I see no
reason to remove it. This has been in the draft since version 0.6, and there
have been no other objections thus far that I recall seeing (if there have
been, feel free to point them out and I will stand corrected).
> I think everyone can vote - but if we say that's not
> so, then I think the ad-hoc part should be removed. Why the special
> treatment?
You're probably right there. It can be removed.
-Tim
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
| (...) I'm actually half and half on it. I do see reasons why to limit it, but for some reason I'm a little wary of accepting it without discussion. (...) Well, at least I haven't noticed it before, otherwise I would have probably mentioned it. But (...) (22 years ago, 6-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
| (...) huh. (...) you're supporting that only LSC-eligable can vote, or that the ad-hoc group can vote? I think everyone can vote - but if we say that's not so, then I think the ad-hoc part should be removed. Why the special treatment? On Mon, May (...) (22 years ago, 6-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
50 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
