To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 2398
2397  |  2399
Subject: 
Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Tue, 6 May 2003 03:22:01 GMT
Viewed: 
7244 times
  
On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 02:36:40AM +0000, Tim Courtney wrote:
> > you're supporting that only LSC-eligable can vote, or that the ad-hoc
> > group can vote?
> 
> Both, but moreso that only LSC-eligable. I'd rather the LSC be selected by
> people who are familiar with the other programmers and potential members, as
> well as the issues the LSC will be dealing with. I think this is a very
> important concern, which minimizes the risk of the LSC being a dud if
> non-technically inclined LDraw.org members cast votes for who should be on
> the LSC. A handful of people have expressed this idea to me.

I'm actually half and half on it.  I do see reasons why to limit it, but
for some reason I'm a little wary of accepting it without discussion.

> If there's only this one objection to the stipulation that only people
> eligible to be members of the LSC can vote people into the LSC, I see no
> reason to remove it. This has been in the draft since version 0.6, and there
> have been no other objections thus far that I recall seeing (if there have
> been, feel free to point them out and I will stand corrected).

Well, at least I haven't noticed it before, otherwise I would have
probably mentioned it.  But you're right - my (possible) objection alone
is not enough to cause a change there.  I just want to see if it bothers
others for the same unknown reason.

> > I think everyone can vote - but if we say that's not
> > so, then I think the ad-hoc part should be removed.  Why the special
> > treatment?
> 
> You're probably right there. It can be removed.

that would be good :)

Dan



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
 
(...) Ok :-) (...) Cool. Anyone else care to add their .02? -Tim (24 years ago, 6-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
 
(...) Both, but moreso that only LSC-eligable. I'd rather the LSC be selected by people who are familiar with the other programmers and potential members, as well as the issues the LSC will be dealing with. I think this is a very important concern, (...) (24 years ago, 6-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

50 Messages in This Thread:
















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR