Subject:
|
Re: Downloadable Handbook?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Mon, 2 Dec 2002 16:48:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
740 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Steve Bliss writes:
> In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Tim Courtney wrote:
> > You guys can go ahead and publish without my review there. Just please try
> > to keep the pages within the existing format and use the appropriate include
> > files.
>
> Urgh. It might be easier to reformat all the existing /reference/
> content to use the /library/ ssi scheme... ;)
I know I eventually wanted to reformat the whole site that way, but was
going to do it piece at a time. So, feel free.
> > > Everything else on this page probably belongs in either "Part Authoring" or
> > > "Specifications".
>
> I didn't see anything that seemed to belong under authoring -- lots of
> stuff that's clearly specification, some stuff that's gray area between
> specs and PT. Maybe the File Types FAQ would go under authoring.
>
> BTW, I'm not really keen on putting FAQ-formatted pages in specs.
You can break down the /reference/faq/ page into categories... would that work?
-Tim
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Downloadable Handbook?
|
| (...) I agree. (...) Urgh. It might be easier to reformat all the existing /reference/ content to use the /library/ ssi scheme... ;) (...) Definitely, there should be cross-linking both ways. (...) I didn't see anything that seemed to belong under (...) (22 years ago, 2-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
