Subject:
|
Re: Downloadable Handbook?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Sat, 30 Nov 2002 23:15:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
340 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Tim Courtney writes:
> Hey Chris -
>
> In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Chris Dee writes:
> > Tim
> > I would prefer that Steve Bliss and I continue to have some involvement with
> > ensuring accuracy and consistency of this "parts authoring" reference
> > material, so we might need to look at permissions on the ldraw.org server.
>
> That's fine with me. I don't touch Parts Tracker stuff :-)
>
> -Tim
But this isn't Parts Tracker stuff - it is Parts Authoring stuff.
I don't think it would be easy for newbies to find under "Specifications" - so
I'd rather see a new "Part Authoring" link on http://www.ldraw.org/reference/.
If we create a new subdirectory "/authoring", are you happy for Steve and I to
maintain the Part Authoring content in this directory as well as some material
in the "/specs" directory (actually permissions look fine)? Or would you
prefer to review material prior to publishing?
Do you mind if I correct any typos and spelling mistakes on the existing pages?
I think the "Parts Tracker" reference - i.e. "The Parts Tracker FAQ", "The
Parts Reviewing FAQ", "Review Posting Information", "L3P -check Messages" and
the PT development stuff should stay where it is in
http://www.ldraw.org/library/tracker/ref/
Everything else on this page probably belongs in either "Part Authoring" or
"Specifications".
Chris
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Downloadable Handbook?
|
| (...) I got "BFC certified" in october (thanks zanette) and now I'm struggling with conditional lines after my minifig helmet got a hold-vote on the PT. therefore I think I'm the ideal newbie. what we need is the following: * Header-standard: Name, (...) (22 years ago, 1-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | Re: Downloadable Handbook?
|
| (...) I don't touch that either ;-) (...) You guys can go ahead and publish without my review there. Just please try to keep the pages within the existing format and use the appropriate include files. (...) That's OK. (...) sym-link over to that (...) (22 years ago, 1-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Downloadable Handbook?
|
| Hey Chris - (...) Ok. (...) It should probably go under specs/ - there's a category on the page called Project Standards. Would it fit there? You can feel free to create another section under specs/ or another directory under reference/ if it really (...) (22 years ago, 30-Nov-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
