Subject:
|
Re: Downloadable Handbook?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Mon, 2 Dec 2002 02:46:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
423 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Tim Courtney wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Chris Dee writes:
> > I don't think it would be easy for newbies to find under "Specifications" - so
> > I'd rather see a new "Part Authoring" link on http://www.ldraw.org/reference/.
>
> Ok.
I agree.
> > If we create a new subdirectory "/authoring", are you happy for Steve and I to
> > maintain the Part Authoring content in this directory as well as some material
> > in the "/specs" directory (actually permissions look fine)? Or would you
> > prefer to review material prior to publishing?
>
> You guys can go ahead and publish without my review there. Just please try
> to keep the pages within the existing format and use the appropriate include
> files.
Urgh. It might be easier to reformat all the existing /reference/
content to use the /library/ ssi scheme... ;)
> > I think the "Parts Tracker" reference - i.e. "The Parts Tracker FAQ", "The
> > Parts Reviewing FAQ", "Review Posting Information", "L3P -check Messages" and
> > the PT development stuff should stay where it is in
> > http://www.ldraw.org/library/tracker/ref/
>
> OK. To maintain continuity, do you think /reference/specs/tracker/ could
> sym-link over to that location?
Definitely, there should be cross-linking both ways.
> > Everything else on this page probably belongs in either "Part Authoring" or
> > "Specifications".
I didn't see anything that seemed to belong under authoring -- lots of
stuff that's clearly specification, some stuff that's gray area between
specs and PT. Maybe the File Types FAQ would go under authoring.
BTW, I'm not really keen on putting FAQ-formatted pages in specs.
I've got some ideas about organizing the specs for file formats and
linetypes and meta-statements, but I'll keep that out of this
discussion.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Downloadable Handbook?
|
| (...) I know I eventually wanted to reformat the whole site that way, but was going to do it piece at a time. So, feel free. (...) You can break down the /reference/faq/ page into categories... would that work? -Tim (22 years ago, 2-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Downloadable Handbook?
|
| (...) I don't touch that either ;-) (...) You guys can go ahead and publish without my review there. Just please try to keep the pages within the existing format and use the appropriate include files. (...) That's OK. (...) sym-link over to that (...) (22 years ago, 1-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
