Subject:
|
Re: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Tue, 5 Mar 2002 04:39:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
384 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Dan Boger writes:
> you missed my point. my point is that Tim doesn't get to assert
> trademarks of ldraw on his own. nevermind that MOTM isn't LDRAW - your
> example is off. More like you came out saying "I'm introducing the
> randome piece of the day!", and me saying "we've been doing that for
> more than a year now!". But like I said, that's not the point.
And didn't I already come clean and admit my mistake there?
And point out where I used the word trademark. I also explained WHAT it was
all about - personal, polite request, with a polite response. Big deal.
As I said, instead of demonizing me, why not channel that same energy into
building a better structure for LDraw.org. Do something positive, not negative.
-Tim
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
|
| (...) you missed my point. my point is that Tim doesn't get to assert trademarks of ldraw on his own. nevermind that MOTM isn't LDRAW - your example is off. More like you came out saying "I'm introducing the randome piece of the day!", and me saying (...) (23 years ago, 5-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
