Subject:
|
Re: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Tue, 5 Mar 2002 04:15:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
437 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Matthew Gerber wrote:
> "I'd like to intoduce the Peeron LEGO Guide, a brand new web site, not
> at all to be confused with the Boger's guide in any way...after all,
> it's just a name, right? Certainly they won't have a problem with
> folks being confused about where there content is versus where my
> content is!"
>
> It's not a trademark...it's consideration for fellow community
> members.
you missed my point. my point is that Tim doesn't get to assert
trademarks of ldraw on his own. nevermind that MOTM isn't LDRAW - your
example is off. More like you came out saying "I'm introducing the
randome piece of the day!", and me saying "we've been doing that for
more than a year now!". But like I said, that's not the point.
> And lets not forget that Tim DID send an e-mail, not a public post.
> This could have been a private conversation, instead of a public
> argument. Further, it is generally considered bad net manners to
> disclose e-mail in a public setting.
true, but has nothing to do with the issue.
Dan.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
|
| (...) And didn't I already come clean and admit my mistake there? And point out where I used the word trademark. I also explained WHAT it was all about - personal, polite request, with a polite response. Big deal. As I said, instead of demonizing (...) (23 years ago, 5-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | Re: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
|
| There is no doubt for me, that at this point it has turned into a mess. I can't say that I know Tim's methodology or motivations for doing anything. Nor do I believe that he is apt to "Bully" anyone. I do know that having contact with Tim over the (...) (23 years ago, 5-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
|
| (...) "I'd like to intoduce the Peeron LEGO Guide, a brand new web site, not at all to be confused with the Boger's guide in any way...after all, it's just a name, right? Certainly they won't have a problem with folks being confused about where (...) (23 years ago, 4-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
