 | | MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts —Tim Courtney
|
| | | Since we appear to be using MPD for the Model Repository, I think its usefulness could be extended. Because of the patterned parts rule - if there isn't a decorated element for a set use the undecorated version - we will need a list of all errors in (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts —Jacob Sparre Andersen
|
| | | | | Tim: (...) Yes, assuming the directories exist. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | (...) Then we should put an errors.txt file in the MPD's to denote each discrepancy in the official models. Especially since a lot of the decorated or sticker elements have not been modeled in LDraw yet. -Tim Courtney ldraw.org Project Coordinator (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts —John VanZwieten
|
| | | | | Tim Courtney <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:199906151603.JA...omm.com... (...) Why not just an errors.dat file with lots of 0 comment lines? What would LDLite do with a .txt file if it found it in an .mpd file? Maybe it doesn't care what (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | (...) A/R?? (...) Good idea.. (...) Ok. (...) Wow! You have pointed out something very serious. Should there be things in the MPD splitters to catch something like that and not allow it to write to c:\ or c:\windows? -Tim Courtney ldraw.org Project (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts —Ryan Dennett
|
| | | | | | | (...) each (...) of the (...) yet. (...) which is a Good (...) A/R?? (...) reason to have an (...) set (things (...) arms, etc. -- all (...) extra (...) And have you made a list of all those extra pieces, Todd? You can't expect people to do that on (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Wouldn't it be A** retentive? I can't think of a four-letter A-word. :) -Tim Courtney ldraw.org Project Coordinator (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) Anal Retentive. I don't know why John said A***, in this context (and most others IMO) Anal isn't really a bad word. Jeff (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts —John VanZwieten
|
| | | | | | | | | | | Jeff Stembel <Dragonelf1@aol.com> wrote in message news:FDDp6J.IHz@lugnet.com... (...) Just wanted to be on the safe side :) -John Van (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) In this context, A/R just means picky about details in a Good Way. --Todd (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts —John VanZwieten
|
| | | | | | | | Scott R Dennett <dennett@agate.net> wrote in message news:199906151254330...ate.net... (...) A*** Retentive, I assume. (...) But it has everything to do with inventorying the parts in a set, which is another plus of the LDraw file, and one of the (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts —Jacob Sparre Andersen
|
| | | | | | Tim Courtney: (...) My MPD splitter never overwrites existing files - unless you set some flag I can't remember, so it should be safe. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- (25 years ago, 17-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) That sounds like a really wise idea...and positively A/R, which is a Good Thing too. :-) And not only that (but related), there probably is a good reason to have an extras.dat file to codify the extra elements that come with a set (things like (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | (...) LDLite do with a .txt file if it found it in an .mpd file? (...) I like this idea beter. LDAO and LDLite would pick it up and display it so people can read it if it was an errors.dat instead of errors.txt. -Tim Courtney ldraw.org Project (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Is there a reason to put all the errors in one place, instead of putting a comment (or a 0 WRITE) before the plain-in-place-of-patterned line? But extras.dat is still needed. And what about part mock-ups for which there is no known part (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts —Ryan Dennett
|
| | | | | (...) number? How (...) What do you mean? If a piece gots voted in then it's official even if we don't know a number for it, correct? Ryan (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) I'm saying if a model requires a part which hasn't been made yet, no number is known for that part ('cause the number isn't imprinted on the part), and an unofficial (or mock-up) file is used as a placeholder for the part, what name should be (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts —Ryan Dennett
|
| | | | | | (...) <dennett@agate.net> (...) yet, no number (...) the part), and (...) the part, what (...) You are asking about unofficial mock-ups? They are not to be included. Only official parts count. Does this answer the question? Ryan (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) OK. You're going to have some funny-looking models, with all those missing parts. Steve (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts —John VanZwieten
|
| | | | | | Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:3767a2e5.193694...net.com... (...) Good incentive for people to learn part-making! Modeling the M:Tron line is what got me into doing parts. -John Van (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | (...) Yes, but that could cause problems down the road. We do try to find numbers for as many parts as possible, but sometimes the TLG part number is not available. We will have to have a system of updating the models once official numbers become (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | |
