|
 | | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
| (...) Than that's not a problem with ldraw.org, that's a problem with the server Mike's pages are on. I can upload my copy of mlcad13.zip to ldraw.org and have two download location choices - he ok'ed the download from ldraw.org. I'll make a note of (...) (25 years ago, 21-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|  
ldraw
(score: 0.169)
|
|
| | Re: Parts and Pattern
|
| John VanZwieten: (...) We just have to put the centre of the sticker where the surface of the part should be. - No big problem. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- (25 years ago, 3-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.168)
|
|
| | Re: Parts and Pattern
|
| (...) And you won't be able to see it reliably. LDraw requires a positional difference of at least 2LDU to prevent co-incident surface bleedthrough. (...) That's an entirely different issue. Using line commands to draw lines on a sticker is (...) (25 years ago, 1-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.168)
|
|
| | Re: ldraw.org Not Found
|
| Hi Tim, I tried something new today. (After seeing ldraw.org on my mom's comp at school I gained renewed interest in solving this problem.) I tried typing in the IP address to see if it would come up. It didn't. I also tried looking for several (...) (25 years ago, 10-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.168)
|
|
| | Re: Parts and Pattern
|
| Yes, I have drawn up the pattern for the black/white bird thing, potentially for the shield and torso. Struggling to find time to do the LDraw work though (due to the recent purchase of a large lot of unsorted parts). I'll register it on the Parts (...) (25 years ago, 31-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.168)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.168)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.168)
|
|
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
| (...) Yeah, I saw that program and downloaded it and just had to write about it :) Mike fully cooperated with my efforts to promote it (I wonder why) ;) and is very open to suggestions for future features. (...) Though this may be a way of covering (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.168)
|
|
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
| (...) Personally I didn't think twice about the Adequate.com red brick on the button. 1) I don't see it around that often and 2) to me the red 2x2 doesn't represent TLG (but to some it may). (...) Thanks :) Uhm, the 6982 was intended to be a (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.168)
|
|
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
| (...) On the small logos it probably would not work, so another solution would have to be devised for that. (...) I'd prefer to keep it red. I don't think a wireframe fade would be considered under TLG's trade dress if a squabble arose. (...) I (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.168)
|
|
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
| (...) Well, if we were to contact TLG, what would be the best approach to it, to get on their good side? I'm not totally objected to contacting them, I just would like to make sure we've done everything we can to have them not jump on us beforehand. (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.168)
|
|
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
| (...) Yeah, as much as I think this whole "trade dress" thing is silly, I agree 100% with Todd right here. Don't get me wrong - I LOVE ldraw.org - I love all the hard work that's gone into it. And maybe it's just the fact that I'm colorblind that (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.168)
|
|
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
| (...) Awesome!!! (...) I'm starting to get worried that the bright red 2x3 brick appearing along the title of all the pages and appearing in all the linking images: (URL) cause confusion among average consumers and therefore concern at TLG. One of (...) (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.168)
|
|
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
| (...) The more I think about it, I think a simple letter would do. But first I think we should experiment a bit with different logos and present them printed on the letter so they can review them right there and state their preference. Once I get (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.168)
|
|
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
| (...) Why? Seems to me that changing to white or grey or blue, if it meant approval from TLG would be no big deal... Red is the color they use for most everything brickish. (...) Probably would in fact be trade dress, as would every other thing (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.168)
|
|
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
| (...) I guess you'd be pretty surprised at some of the legal questions I've asked TLG out of the blue then! :-) Maybe I'm just weird like that. (...) That doesn't help me worry about it any less. But again, maybe I'm just weird like that. (...) Hmm. (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.168)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.168)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.168)
|
|
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
| (...) IANAL, so I may be way off base, but I wouldn't worry quite as much about that image, for several reasons: 1) It's got a blinking "Search..." on the side; it's not a static image of a brick. (Maybe that's not a significant difference.) 2) What (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.168)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.168)
|
