|
 | | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| (...) Nope, not a joke. I seriously didn't remember the reason(s) why other approaches wouldn't work as well as INVERTNEXT. I poked around old messages a little bit, I think I remember better now. Let me (attempt to) explain: When this whole BFC (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|  
ldraw
(score: 0.180)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw DAT certification for clones?
|
| (...) Question #20. I don't about "official", but I have some other words to describe it... That article (question 20) is too large for the FAQ, and should be broken out as a separate item/page on the website. (...) Seems like the best way to go (...) (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.180)
|
|
| | Re: What is 'LDraw?'
|
| (...) Hi Adam! (...) Right. (...) We could keep the parts .dat and make new models .ldr (or .ldm - LDraw Model), or we could also change parts to .ldp (LDraw Part), just to distinguish the difference. (...) Yeah, I'd really like to see LDraw II come (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.180)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw DAT certification for clones?
|
| Tim: (...) Yes. The FAQ contains something that is supposed to be a description of the LDraw language. I don't know if people consider it "official". (...) Yes. Some formal specifications, some example files, and maybe even some programs for testing (...) (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.180)
|
|
| | Re: What is the IP for ldraw.org?
|
| Jonathan: (...) For a temporary fix, append the following line to "/etc/hosts" (that's the name of the file in Unix): 130.226.51.217 hugin.risoe.dk www.ldraw.org That way your machine will skip looking www.ldraw.org up through DNS. Play well, Jacob (...) (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.180)
|
|
| | OMR Planning - Almost There
|
| Ryan, Jeff, Todd, etc. I just unearthed an old unfinished project of mine - the OMR Model Creation/Submission guide for ldraw.org. Now I see that we were much further along than I thought we were. Some things that need to be finalized are: Model (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.180)
|
|
| | Re: What is 'LDraw?'
|
| (...) Is that an educated guess of a figure? ;) (...) Yeah... .mpl (Multi-Part LDraw) ? (...) Agreed. (...) That would be a good thing. The only argument I see against changing them is tradition, to which I say, 'poo.' -Tim (URL) timcourtne ICQ: (...) (25 years ago, 12-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.180)
|
|
| | Re: General Comments to MLCad
|
| (...) Could you avoid writing out the file as a ".DAT" file extension if you are making extensions to the long established LDraw DAT file format? This would clear up confusion right away and avoid further incompatibility issues if other LDraw-clone (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.180)
|
|
| | Re: What is 'LDraw?'
|
| (...) Right now, the website pretty much *is* the organization. We don't have a membership list, or a secret handshake, or even a definition of who's in the group. I'm alright with this loose organization, but I feel that there isn't a big point of (...) (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.180)
|
|
| | Re: OMR Planning - Almost There
|
| (...) I believe you mean lugnet.cad.models.sets (...) One problem I foresee is that you are required to register in order to post. One way this could be solved would be to register ldraw.org as a valid poster, and then post the messages from an (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.180)
|
|
| | Re: What is 'LDraw?'
|
| (...) I'd like to see that happen too. But AFAIK I don't know of any reply from Zach Benz on the question. If he gives the OK, I'm all for it. Jacob would have to write something to make it run, I'm a dud when it comes to programming. -Tim (URL) (...) (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.180)
|
|
| | Re: The updated PARTS.LST online?
|
| (...) It is? Well, duh. Thanks for the info. Anyway, I still think that a browsable parts.lst could be a good idea. Sometimes I have the need to look up a part name or number when I'm not on a system with LDraw on it, and I think perhaps others may (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.180)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.180)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.180)
|
|
| | Re: The updated PARTS.LST online?
|
| (...) Sounds like a good idea. Would /download/updates/ be appropriate for this? And does anyone have a non-butchered current parts.lst (unlike mine) they'd send for this? I'll get it up at least by Thursday, when I update the MOTM voting. -Tim (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.180)
|
|
| | Re: OMR Planning - Almost There
|
| (...) Maybe that's where the model editors would come in. But it's a headache nonetheless. (...) I was thinking along the lines of people impersonating others. But there are probably other rules too... (...) I was thinking that if you want ldraw.org (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.180)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.180)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.180)
|
|
| | The updated PARTS.LST online?
|
| I think it would be a good idea to make the updated PARTS.LST file be available online as new releases are made. I know that the PARTS.LST file should be remade on the local system as the new parts are installed, but I still think it would be nice (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.180)
|
|
| | Re: What is 'LDraw?'
|
| Tim Courtney wrote: <Good questions. Which I snipped.> In my opinion: A name is needed to identify the concept of "formated to be compatible with LDraw and LEdit, as extended". This name needs to be separate from the concept of "the LDraw suite of (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.180)
|
