Results 5041 – 5060 of 7032.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
| |
|  
ldraw
(score: 0.192)
|
|
 | | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
| (...) Yep. I'd change the rename of the 'Technic Connector Locking' to 'Technic Connector Toggle Locking'. (...) I know what you mean about the angled connectors. I suppose they should be "Technic Connector Angled". I'll think on that some more (...) (25 years ago, 11-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.192)
|
|
| | Comments on parts up for vote- Pt 1
|
| I made it half way through the parts when MSOE crashed and lost my comments, so I'll do this one in rounds. 6199.dat - Belville Swing: missing edgelines where the uprights meet the crossbar. Since the bars are equal diameter, this can easily be (...) (25 years ago, 11-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.192)
|
|
| | l3lab on linux
|
| Well, I wanted to participate in the part voting, so I decided to try and run l3lab on my RH linux, using wine. It did start up, and seems to work - but every time I try to open a file, I get messages "Could not fine xxxx.dat Referenced by ...." the (...) (25 years ago, 11-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.192)
|
|
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
| (...) It's probably a good idea to add the sizing information. (...) There's also a fix in this update to rename the old 'Technic Connector Locking' to 'Technic Toggle Joint Locking'. (...) There is precedence on using the part name to differentiate (...) (25 years ago, 11-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.192)
|
|
| | Technic Wingback Piece - 2744.DAT
|
| Firstly, let me say (because I don't think it's said enough) thanks to all the LDraw wizards that keep those new parts coming! Secondly, I must regret that I'm piping up in here at the moment cuz I found something that needs fixin. Let me also say (...) (25 years ago, 10-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.192)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.192)
|
|
| | New ldraw.org Feature Article
|
| Greetings I just added a new Feature Article to ldraw.org. Here Jonathan Knudsen, author of The Unofficial Guide to LEGO MINDSTORMS Robots, explains his techniques for designing building instructions using LDraw, MLCad, L3P, and POV-Ray. Check it (...) (25 years ago, 21-Mar-00, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.192)
|
|
| | Re: Some Words To BFC
|
| (...) That's not always possible, as has been discussed. And is still being discussed... (...) Yeah, that's a possibility. (...) OK, but that's a complication for the rendering engine. It would have to check the actual path of each file, after the (...) (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.192)
|
|
| | Re: Is James' website finally gone for good?
|
| (...) Tim, do you want to ask them, as the head honcho of ldraw.org content? Jacob, do you have a copy of James' site-files? I do, if you don't. Oops--I just checked, his site is back online. But maybe it makes sense to have a permanent mirror in (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.192)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.192)
|
|
| | Re: Is James' website finally gone for good?
|
| Steve: (...) It would be very sad if all his work is lost, so we should definitely offer to host the site on ldraw.org, unless James' parents have another idea. (...) I think we should ask them about it. - And also ask if it is ok to continue the (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.192)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.192)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.192)
|
|
| | Re: BFC: LITS 2
|
| (...) Actually, the problem is that their determinant is 0, neither positive nor negative. So the renderer would have to disable BFC processing for any file with this kind of reference. Another problem (that L3P handles in most cases) is that (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.192)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.192)
|
|
| | Re: Performance Improvement
|
| Steve: (...) I can't see how Rui's suggested change gives any problems at all and I don't mind a few percent speed increase. (...) And? Does the "diameter line" not cross the radius? If there is a significant risk of a misalignment, then we (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.192)
|
|
| | Re: Some Words To BFC
|
| (...) OK, here's a counter-proposal: don't require all parts/primitives to be BFC'able, and allow both BFC-ready and BFC-not-ready files in the same rendering. This reintroduces the concept of having a single meta-statement at the start of each (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.192)
|
|
| | BFC checking program (was Re: Some Words To BFC)
|
| (...) I'm assuming that you're calling "BFC-ready" primitives that have all faces in the same direction. Primitives are not closed volumes so you'll always be able to see the backfaces. (...) I agree technically it doesn't make much difference, I (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.192)
|
|
| | Re: The geometry of minifigs
|
| (...) Da, you are correct. I'd go with the (14,0) shoulder position -- it has better (hidden) precision. 14.345 is derived, as you pointed out, and it is rounded. Does LGEO have the minifig torso? It'd be so nice to have truly rounded edges and (...) (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.192)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
