To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 4395
4394  |  4396
Subject: 
Re: Performance Improvement
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Fri, 7 Apr 2000 15:31:16 GMT
Viewed: 
2382 times
  
Steve:

I think that it's better to keep the 4-4disc and 2-4disc files the way
they are.  The current configuration is more flexible, requires fewer
special-size primitives, and is less likely to be mis-applied. The new
proposal would only provide a small benefit to rendering speed.

I can't see how Rui's suggested change gives any problems at
all and I don't mind a few percent speed increase.

I don't see a problem with doing this for the 4-4disc, but it would be a
problem for the 2-4disc.  The 2-4disc is often used in conjuction with a
1-4disc

And?

Does the "diameter line" not cross the radius? If there is a
significant risk of a misalignment, then we shouldn't do it
with the 2-4disc.

On the other hand does the current 2-4disc give problems, if
it is at a surface edge...

Play well,

Jacob

------------------------------------------------------------
--  E-mail:               sparre@cats.nbi.dk              --
--  Web...:   <URL: http://hugin.ldraw.org/LEGO/Dyr/ >    --
------------------------------------------------------------



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Performance Improvement  [DAT]
 
(...) As I said before, in this case it's more correct to use 3-4disc primitive, to avoid the T type juntions. (...) Yes, cracks may appear ! Same problem like in a T type junction But has someone said, nothing like real/concrete testing, so here (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Performance Improvement
 
Rui, I think that it's better to keep the 4-4disc and 2-4disc files the way they are. The current configuration is more flexible, requires fewer special-size primitives, and is less likely to be mis-applied. The new proposal would only provide a (...) (25 years ago, 5-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)

11 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR