CAD Development : Search Results: Stickers in LDraw


CAD / Development / Search Results: Stickers in LDraw

Results 4301 – 4320 of 7032.

Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
(...) I like that. I think a clear indication that a comment is in fact a meta statement is needed. And I find "0 {META} " more distinct than (META), <META>, {BFC}, <BFC>, MODULENAME and whatever else has been suggested. But we're still stuck with (...) (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.842)

		Re: Calling all Meta-commands
In lugnet.cad.dev, Larry Pieniazek writes: [...] (...) I agree with the route of a standards body to control (officially adopted) meta-commands. The second option is just a fix, and the third option is unacceptable, especially if we want to see more (...) (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.842)

		Re: Web Searching Reveals More LDraw Programs
(...) you fill me in? Jake --- Jake McKee LEGO Enthusiast Webmaster - B.I. Portal (URL) (22 years ago, 3-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.842)

		Re: Web Searching Reveals More LDraw Programs
(...) I've never even heard of these before...I'll look into Dan adding them to the download pages. -Tim (22 years ago, 3-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.842)

		Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
(...) I don't see how a lock is practical. We don't even have an official standards body yet. I don't know how you would enforce it any way. My goal in making the call was to document what is there, so that people: a) don't produce name space (...) (22 years ago, 15-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.842)

		Re: Web Searching Reveals More LDraw Programs
(...) The following already reported programs should be listed as well: Edger: (URL) (22 years ago, 3-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.842)

		Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
(...) Having read the other replies to this post, I feel that--no matter how well-intentioned--putting a lock on new meta-commands is both wrong and impractical. The simple fact is that all LDraw-based development is done voluntarily. As such, it's (...) (22 years ago, 15-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.842)

		Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
(...) I agree the backward compatibility is good, to a point. This is especially true for the parts library. Too many times we refuse to fix something or extend the file spec (e.g. new colors not able to be represented by existing color numbers) (...) (22 years ago, 15-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.842)

		Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
(...) I agree. Establishing such a lock means however we need to move rather quickly on a standards body. I know there are others like Steve and Larry who will want to weigh in on this, but they're busy this weekend. I'm traveling up to Steve's next (...) (22 years ago, 15-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.842)

		Re: Calling all Meta-commands
(...) Are we REALLY stuck with current meta-commands? Sure if we change them all (the META Statements) after setting up a "body of standards" our old files may not work but somewhere down the future is it NOT better to NOT worry about backward (...) (22 years ago, 15-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.842)

		Re: Calling all Meta-commands
Having read through this thread, I've seen a lot of good points made. However, it also appears that people haven't really fully thought about the implications of meta-commands. It's very important to realize that meta-commands are presented as (...) (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.842)

		Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
Orion Pobursky wrote: What are we going to do when DOS support in PC OS's goes away completely? I have run into this problem with Windows XP, not so much with LEdit and LDraw--I use L3P more often. Thankfully, there is still a Win98 SE computer in (...) (22 years ago, 15-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.842)

		Re: Calling all Meta-commands
In thinking about this a bit more, I flashed on a quote from Yoda in one of the Star Wars movies "Hard to see the future is".... I've added some meta-commands to the name space that are certainly specific to LPub and the creation of building (...) (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.842)

		DAT Curves Plugin For LDDesignPad Version 2.5.1
(...) Ok. The rotation now centers on the Bounding Box center. Get it at: (URL) (22 years ago, 19-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.842)

		Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
(...) No, I think the intention is to create an official set of meta-commands, which official software should recognise and/or implement. The important point being that any file containing non-ratified commands will not make it into the official (...) (22 years ago, 16-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.842)

		Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
(...) Certified does sound better in that context, and I think certification could be a good thing. We should figure out how best to frame it, but I think it would add to the strength and usefulness of LDraw.org as a central resource for all of (...) (22 years ago, 23-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.842)

		Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
(...) I agree that we have to avoid that risk you refer to, and I would suggest that be part of the LSC charter. As for the steering committee, I'm not sure the post from 2 years ago is really valid anymore, and would suggest the community start (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.842)

		Re: What's up with www.ldraw.org?
(...) I hope it all goes well. I've posted Ldraw027.exe and a complete.exe on my yahoo site. You should be able to get to it here (URL) version has a 2/18/02 date on it, but it is the latest I could find. If anyone has the current one I'ld be happy (...) (22 years ago, 8-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.842)

		Re: Calling all Meta-commands
(...) This is the approach that Michael Lachman on MLCAD. In an email, where he gave us permission to include his meta-command descriptions in our LDraw specification (yay!) he indicated that he has started to use MLCAD as his module name for all (...) (22 years ago, 19-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.842)

		Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
(...) right. (...) but you just said you're doing that anyway - "if you do not recognize the first token in a line type 0 record, it is a comment". Is adding '{META}' to the list of recognizable tokens an issue? Also, you don't have to add it - if (...) (22 years ago, 16-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.842)

More: Next Page >>