Subject:
|
Re: Calling all Meta-commands
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 14 Mar 2003 23:48:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1473 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Larry Pieniazek writes:
[...]
> Now, who owns the defintion of what SYNTH does? You? Them? Both of you
> jointly? No one? Blech.
>
> We either need a standards body to control the commands and hand them out
> judiciously(1), or we need to use prefixes (program names or whatever)(2) so
> we don't step on each other, or we need to live with the chaos that will
> ensue from doing neither of the above.
I agree with the route of a standards body to control (officially adopted)
meta-commands. The second option is just a fix, and the third option is
unacceptable, especially if we want to see more people use these tools and
develop for the LDraw format.
> If there are other choices I'm not sure what they are but I'm open to
> hearing about them.
-Tim
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Calling all Meta-commands
|
| (...) Namespace Pollution is a technical term. It's not meant as an insult, mind you. It refers to a common phenomena in programming, in which things become hard to use because of scope problems, because things named in global scope interfere with (...) (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
154 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
