CAD Development : Search Results: Stickers in LDraw


CAD / Development / Search Results: Stickers in LDraw

Results 2861 – 2880 of about 7000.

Search took 0.00 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: New BFC Spec
(...) I have to disagree with this (nice of you to say it, though :). Ultimately, the community has the final say. Here's my feedback & suggested revisions for version 12. You could've just dropped the old revision numbers. That would have made the (...) (22 years ago, 29-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.308)

		Re: Latest BFC Spec?
(...) I started creating a page for LDraw.org out of Travis' text file of the BFC spec. Should I wait, since you're adding numbers? The one Travis sent me didn't have numbers in them. -Tim (22 years ago, 23-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.308)

		Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
(...) I really agree with Dan on this point. As I mentioned in another message, a standards body could certainly come up with suggestions for standard commands, but they wouldn't have any power of enforcement. About the only thing ldraw.org could[1] (...) (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.308)

		Re: Calling all Meta-commands
(...) Good point. Thanks for nit-correcting, I think the intent is there on my part but semantics can play a role in whether or not people like/dislike an idea. (...) You're right on that part. That's why it would be a good thing to encourage (not (...) (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.308)

		Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
(...) Very good point. In my conversations with a few semi-outsiders to the LDraw community, they believed systems could (or should, I see your [1] and rase you that) be established to encourage participation and compliance, but could not/should not (...) (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.308)

		Re: Calling all Meta-commands
Hi All, Wow! This thread has created more postings that I thought it would. So far I've gathered meta-commands from (URL) Eriksson LTrax, Parent: Kevin Clague - LPub and LSynth There must be more. If you know of programs that define their own (...) (22 years ago, 15-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.308)

		Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
(...) I agree. I don't think a program can be "compatible" with an organization. It can be "certified" by one, though: LDraw.org-Certified. Of course, this might have stronger implications than LDraw.org-compatible. On the other hand, maybe that's a (...) (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.308)

		Re: Calling all Meta-commands
(...) I searched through all my LDraw email archives, with key messages going back to 1999(!), and couldn't find it. So, I emailed Jacob for instructions and will get this done in the next day or so, when he gets that to me. -Tim (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.308)

		Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
(...) Sorry, 'LDraw.org-compatible programs'. Which is poor terminology, I think. Steve (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.307)

		Re: Calling all Meta-commands
(...) I agree. (...) Nit: we've already got an LDraw file format spec. Next item! (...) 'Control' is heavy-handed for my tastes. 'Support', 'endorse', 'coordinate' are all better. All a standards body could do is manage the documentation, and (...) (22 years ago, 21-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.307)

		New BFC Spec
I have created an updated revision of the BFC spec, available from the following location: (URL) create this file, I started with bfcspecv4.txt (which was actually revision 10), then remarked every line in the file to be revision 10, then made my (...) (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.307)

		Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
(...) Certified does sound better in that context, and I think certification could be a good thing. We should figure out how best to frame it, but I think it would add to the strength and usefulness of LDraw.org as a central resource for all of (...) (22 years ago, 23-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.307)

		Re: A call to membership!
[XPFUT lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw] (...) I'm interested and willing. Count me in. Although I may be a dissenting voice on a number of organizational issues. Steve (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.307)

		Re: Calling all Meta-commands
(...) Because it wouldn't be supported by LDraw and LEdit. Part files frequently include comments, so any standard option for commenting should be allowable in the parts library. (...) Some people already use COMMENT. Steve (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.307)

		The DOS apps (was Re: Backwards Compatibility)
Lars Hassing wrote: > Ryan Farrington wrote: >>I have run into this problem with Windows XP, not so much with LEdit and >>LDraw--I use L3P more often. Thankfully, there is still a Win98 SE computer >>in the house! > > In Windows XP you can open a (...) (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.307)

		Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
(...) Right. But newer OS's and video cards are becoming less compatible with DOS programs, especially DOS programs that do graphics. I used to be able to run LDraw with Super-VGA resolutions (with Win95, I think). I haven't been able to that in (...) (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.307)

		Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
(...) See this web page: (URL) this one: (URL) (22 years ago, 15-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.307)

		Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
(...) Hi Orion, Here is my take on the current state of LDraw related tools and parts library. There are a few documents that sketch out the basic mechanics of what we use today, but the real standards are the programs that we have that use them. We (...) (22 years ago, 15-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.307)

		Re: Calling all Meta-commands
(...) not that anyone ever heard of it, but ESQL (IBM language for MQSI) uses double hyphen for comments. That said, if I had to choose between '--' and '//', I'd go with the slashes. oooh - here's an idea. We could change the Ldraw.org poll (which (...) (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.307)

		Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
(...) I like that. I think a clear indication that a comment is in fact a meta statement is needed. And I find "0 {META} " more distinct than (META), <META>, {BFC}, <BFC>, MODULENAME and whatever else has been suggested. But we're still stuck with (...) (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.307)

More: Next Page >>