To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 8532
8531  |  8533
Subject: 
Re: Calling all Meta-commands
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 18:58:29 GMT
Viewed: 
1427 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev, Tim Courtney wrote:

These are very good points. As a non-programmer, but someone who has a
general knowledge of the LDraw file format, I think it is a good idea to
separate comments from meta-commands.

I agree.

Also, talk of a standards body is a good thing. The goal is to create a
board for technical standards that doesn't bog developers down in
unnecessary bureaucracy, but one that does what is needed. We need to have a
definitive LDraw file format spec, ...

Nit:  we've already *got* an LDraw file format spec.  Next item!

... and a process for new meta-commands to
get added to the spec. As Larry suggested here:

http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dev/?n=8415

the standards body should control the (officially adopted) meta-commands.

'Control' is heavy-handed for my tastes.  'Support', 'endorse', 'coordinate' are
all better.  All a standards body could do is manage the documentation, and
encourage people to use the standard language.  'Control' is not possible -- all
anyone has to do is say, "Hey ldraw.org!  I think you people made stupid decisions
on meta-statement FOO, and I'm going to implement it my own way."

Others in the software industry or with more programming/standards
experience may be more articulate than I am on this issue. Just making it
known that I stand behind an effort to organize the LDraw file format spec
and establish a process for improving upon that spec.

Nit: that would be LDraw.org file format spec.

Steve



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Calling all Meta-commands
 
(...) Good point. Thanks for nit-correcting, I think the intent is there on my part but semantics can play a role in whether or not people like/dislike an idea. (...) You're right on that part. That's why it would be a good thing to encourage (not (...) (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Calling all Meta-commands
 
(...) Kevin & Travis - These are very good points. As a non-programmer, but someone who has a general knowledge of the LDraw file format, I think it is a good idea to separate comments from meta-commands. Also, talk of a standards body is a good (...) (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

154 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR